English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Because whatever it is, I'm not seeing it.

And I will personally respond to your answers by adding details to this question so be sure to check back here after you've answered.

2007-07-02 15:17:30 · 16 answers · asked by sillygoose112393 4 in Politics & Government Politics

I am speechless to the first three answers.

2007-07-02 15:21:18 · update #1

For Lindsey - Are we talking about the same Hillary Clinton?

2007-07-02 15:22:30 · update #2

Amen Bobby, but I must ask, why isn't she right JUST now. I must believe she is wrong on any year.

2007-07-02 15:24:04 · update #3

I simply cannot fight this...this obnoxious voice you dems are supplying me with. I guess its just not in me to understand what any of you are talking about. If you want Hillary in office, I'll be pleased to see your faces when she finally is. Oh and I'll be moving to Canada.

2007-07-02 15:30:50 · update #4

1-4-all;

I am in awe at you. You are the exact person I was waiting to hear from. You explain EXACTLY why any Clinton CANNOT be suitable to run a country. AND any LIBERAL. I couldn't add anything else if I tried. Bless you for pulling the words straight from my lips and thank you for putting it so well. You couldn't be more right and I am so glad to have heard from you!!

2007-07-02 17:33:04 · update #5

16 answers

hillary could never do it and I really hope she never does. she is the ideal democrat
an ideal dimocrat is :

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.

2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Chinese and North Korean communists.

4. You have to believe that there was no art before Federal funding.

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical documented changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV's.

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual is natural.

7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.

8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.

11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own money to make The Passion of the Christ for financial gain only.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and Thomas Edison & A.G. Bell.

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.

16. You have to believe that Hillary Clinton is normal and is a very nice person.

17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.

18. You have to believe conservatives telling the truth belong in jail, but a liar and a sex offender belonged in the White House.

19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites, and bestiality should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.

20. You have to believe that illegal Democratic Party funding by the Chinese Government is somehow in the best interest to the United States.

21. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast, right wing conspiracy.

22. You have to believe that it's okay to give Federal workers off on Christmas Day but it's not okay to say "Merry Christmas."

2007-07-02 16:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by 1-4-all 3 · 1 1

I think she is extremely intelligent and very experienced. In debates and talks I've seen on TV she is also very prepared. She has studied every issue facing our country and has specific proposals for addressing them. In other words, she has competence, something our country has been missing for seven years and desperately needs.

I agree that she has made mistakes and is not the most charming, warm, charistmatic person I've ever seen. However, many people were taken in by Bush's charm, and you see where that got our country--run into a ditch. So perhaps this next time we should vote for intelligence and experience and leave the charm to the diplomats.

2007-07-02 15:23:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Experienced political operative.
Woman.
Democrat, semi-centrist + Clintonista (d'ye THINK?)
Holding significant elected office, same office as Bobby Kennedy when he was almost elected president

Electability depends on whom the Bad Guys put up, but a Hillary v. Giuliani campaign would be winnable though at a terrible price.

2007-07-02 15:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

She is a Dem= Billys wife Leading in the Dems pole they want a Dem- to be President no matter what she says or does an she ahead. It's not what they stand for it just beat out the Rep.Control & power. Look at the shamnesty bill she voted for it to selling out the USA citizens & they still don't care shes ahead.No matter what she does.Were in deep= if she wins.

2007-07-02 15:29:01 · answer #4 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0 0

I personally think she is too conservative (she's much more conservative than Nixon, but you might be too young to remember that). But if she gets the nomination, I'll certainly support her. The Republicans have gone the Neo-con route, which I think is terribly damaging to our constitution, environment, and energy independence. Ron Paul might be a good possibility for the repubs, but he's not going to get the nomination.

2007-07-02 15:28:32 · answer #5 · answered by s 4 · 0 0

An honest woman that has on occasion been misunderstood. She is a very shy person and it takes a while for her to warm up in a crowd.

I will vote for her for her intelligence, qualifications and experience in world affairs. It would be a blessing to have her as President. We should be proud she offering her experience and charm.

2007-07-02 15:24:17 · answer #6 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1 0

In my opinion she is intellegent and experienced. I also like how she stands on most issues...but I do not deny that she has made some mistakes (voting for the war in Iraq). Yes we are talking about the same Hillary.

2007-07-02 15:20:41 · answer #7 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 3 1

You can get more from the government with Hillary. Free Health Care! Tax the rich! Give to the poor! Cool.

2007-07-02 15:20:02 · answer #8 · answered by en tu cabeza 4 · 1 2

I have not decided yet who I will support, however Rupert Murdock the owner of Fox news seems to love Hillary, as he funds her campaign and fundraisers!

2007-07-02 15:26:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If Hillary is the nominee I Will support her. because the alternative is unimaginable to me

2007-07-02 15:22:29 · answer #10 · answered by crazzy 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers