The independent investigation did not turn up violations of FISA law, but did uncover perjury committed to obstruct justice in discovering who revealed state secrets to punish whistleblowers.
Is forgiving Libby better or worse than a $60 million Whitewater investigation leading to impeachment proceedings over a dress stain?
Whitewater ended up with a dress stain because despite all the splashing, there were never any real fish there. Just the little minnow. The Plame pond, however, was filled with bloated carp but all that ended up in the net was Scooter. The giant Rove carp still lurks. Which was worse?
2007-07-02
15:14:09
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Kikidi's--Whitewater was about an investment Hillary made into some real estate venture, in which she lost $20,000 and neglected to file the loss on her income taxes.
I like to contrast Whitewater with Harken Energy--a corporation on which George W. Bush sat as a member of the board of directors. When the board made a decision that was about to cause the company's stock value to tank, Bush sold--profitting $800,000.
Now that's "insider trading." Hillary had no insider position in Whitewater. Yet $60,000,000 of the public treasury was squandered on an extensive fishing expedition which resulted in impeachment proceedings. "High crimes or treason."
President Bush refuses to allow staff members to testify concerning the firing of US attorneys for political purposes so he can avoid suborning perjury, and the humiliation of impeachment for a trumped up cause.
"High crimes or treason." Indeed. Outing covert agents, putting lives at risk, or lying about oral sex? What is treason?
2007-07-02
19:12:45 ·
update #1