This has been the most corrupt administration I have seen and read about in history. Libby should have served his sentence. If it were anyone else, they would have paid the price. Lil' Bush says he can go. Let us not forget Iraq's invasion. Consider Bush's unorthodox actions in the past years and tell me if you think he should be impeached, as well as Cheney.
2007-07-02 15:03:13 · 20 answers · asked by Julie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
absolutely, without hesitation
2007-07-02 15:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by crazzy 4 · 4⤊ 6⤋
You can't impeach someone just because you are a liberal and like gay people. There is no such law that allows you to impeach the president because he pardons someone or because the CONGRESS supports the war by financing it. Do you want to impeach the whole congress? If you want to fight on our own soil then we can all start letting the terrorist come here, but if you don't want to walk to school/work dodging bullets then i suggest you start supporting the actions our country is taking. By the way, some of you people that say the president should be executed can't say that stuff...it is a free country, but if you want to talk about treason then that is treason.
2007-07-04 03:55:40 · answer #2 · answered by berryfremont 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Did you support suddam? even if bush's reasons were wrong, the fact is that with U.S. forces in iraq and the rest of the middle east we can control and limit terrorist actions a little easier. Plus we toppled a cruel dictator, and even if things aren't going very well righ now, just the fact that we set up a democracy in iraq shows that we accomplished something, which will hopefully grow, improve, and strengthen.
2007-07-02 15:17:10 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush should have been Impeached a long time ago. Lets see....
There was Plagiarizing legal documents from Africa to Iraq saying that Africa sold WMDs to Iraq.
There was Lying to Congress about WMDs to go to war with Iraq.
There was leaking classified information about an undercover CIA field agent. "which happens to be treason"
There was the un-bided contract that went to Halliburton for Iraq. After investigation they found an e-mail from Cheney setting the hole thing up. Cheney just happened to be the ex CEO of the company. That's a little thing called conflict of interest.
After congress did an audit they found out that Halliburton over charged the American people by over a billion dollars, but we still pay them today for the contract they still never bided for.
So pick and choose.. Either way Bush should been impeached long ago. I mean come on they tried to impeach Clinton for lying about a BJ. Bush lied about committing Treason to the country his is suppose to be leading. His lies has taken the lives of over 3,000 American Solders and over 600,000 Iraqi civilians...
2007-07-02 15:09:50 · answer #4 · answered by usefulidiot230 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Impeachment is the least of it. 25 to life for multiple counts of conspiracy. Whom else do we indict? is the real question.
Rove
Rice
Rumsfeld
Aschcroft
Powell (he lied to the UN about the WMD, if he does not have a defense he should do time)
Gonzales (the lawyer for torture; disbarment is not enough, either)
Back during Watergate, there was a snarky song about "Kissinger und Kleindienst und Klein," which was NOT to the tune of Three Little Maids from School Are We...but I'm working on it.
In fact, given the nature of this administration, I do think that The Mikado can be recast to address current affairs. The little maids become R&R&R. Somehow.
We have to laugh about this. We also need to be pissed off as all hell. But if we can't laugh at these Neocon Marx Brothers, they will already have won.
We can't let them win.
2007-07-02 15:12:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
No, but only because impeachment for ignorance simply compounds the folly. This administration HAS committed cardinal stuff-ups, but for the most part it's as a result of misguided advice, predominantly as regards the Middle East...
The sooner they all go fishing, the better....
2007-07-02 15:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
No impeachable offense has taken place. Bush is well within his rights to commute a sentence if he so chooses.
I guess you forgot that in Boy Clinton's last few days in orifice he pardoned convicted felons left and right. No cries of righteous indignation from Democrats were raised then, were they?
2007-07-02 15:12:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
How r u gonna impeach them, the Dems couldn't even pass the amnesty bill with Ws help?
2007-07-02 15:06:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋
You cannot impeach somebody because you disagree with their policies. To impeach somebody that person needs to commit a crime.
2007-07-02 15:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by Matt M 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
People keep saying Bush should be impeached, but YOU CAN'T NAME ONE LAW THAT HE HAS BROKEN. Please name the law!!!!!!! OR SHUT UP!! You people are messed in the head. Give it up!
2007-07-02 15:11:52 · answer #10 · answered by en tu cabeza 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Turn them over to the Iraqis they will handle them just like they did Saddam
2007-07-02 15:12:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋