What do you think? New non-BIG BANG THEORY!?

Question

Because there is something. (Matter) If there were nothing even nothing is something.. However, if there were nothing then life would not exist. The New Math... (n = "infinite quantity" any number not 0 not negative 1/n x a helium atom(any particle) = a gas (matter)) The universe, calculated at the starting point = n/1 matter and 1/n space + (n/1)energy +time "so n/1 matter/ 1/n space + n/1 energy will equal 1/n matter/ n/1 space - n/1 energy +time" this is the gas theory math SPOKEN .... ""infinite matter and little space equals infinte space and little matter with energy being the reactant" OR matter/space plus energy plus time equals space/matter minus energy minus time" The gas theory (the starting point is....) matter/space This gas has no properties over time it condenses to 1/4 space 3/4 matter until today it reaches n/1 space 1/n matter At some point the gas develops properties the development of friction is the key event the energy that rapidly reduces the universe could easily leave a fingerprint not unlike that discovered by att...."this is the something from something theory" while the big bang is the "something from nothing theory". Nothing isnt something ever. In my opinion the big bang could only have come about if something had collapsed and condensed into the small dot of matter described. the current theory is preposterous and without foundation everything would have been pulverized, only gasses could have exsisted ....except for the "fingerprint" HOWEVER THE BIG BANGS SO CALLED echo or fingerprint would be "far greater"(very evergetic at a much higher frequency) than just back-round radiation, since the microwaves tend to step up not down. Perhaps vast clouds or wave pools very low density yet highly ebergetic. that is to say I could believe 2 things, 1. friction caused electrical activity could produce microwaves 2. there could still be some gas-left somewhere in the universe, since it is not gravitationally effected to remain near the reduction events. my math will remain !! 1/n times 1 helium atom(any particle) !! times n (matter/space) +n/1 energy n = "infinite" not 0 not any negative numbers = (space/matter)- n/1 energy "Proportion Not Relative" As I can explain it Proportion has no place in the universe....However there is an order to the way matter plays out in space....Look at a field of light particles, now imagine the space between each particle...the mass is displaced yet the motion is relative and constant. Its likely that the matter is toward the front of "flight profile" and the Gravitation is evenly displaced over time and space. Now IF we were in a similar field...a field of vastly larger objects all aligned in a (as a) field, gravitation displaced, going from point A to point B at a constant velocity with eons and eons of time between each "object"...perhaps a field of black-holes...then Time would allow existence...a Gas could still be the starting point out there beyond human comprehension, yet all part of the grand scheme. Even "Heaven" a timeless place could exist...without dimensions or even paradoxes...Just the Universe being unable to be aware of Proportion...Forever doomed to sort out every wisp of matter...suffering hot and cold, dense and light, space and matter, Friction and Emptiness...and worse yet Time, the enemy of old men, tearing the Universe apart, giving it a birth and maybe even a death! Somewhere out there lay virgin matter the original Gas. Could this field of vast objects similar to light be the Gas...Can we see light from so far off that it can somehow be the model from and the closest relative of the Gas? In reality without proportion...from some point at some time every object is a mere wisp.. a wisp of SOMETHING! THE SOMETHING THAT THAT MAKES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE! Why the universe exists? "AFTER ALL IF THERE WERE NOTHING THEN THERE COULD BE NO THING" HOWEVER THERE IS "SOME THING" AND THIS MAKES LIFE POSSIBLE. JE Bressman arr.. edu use ok @2007 The BIG BANGs "accelerations velocities and densities" would not allow the universe to recombine! (after the Big Bang event...) And since the question remains WHERE DID THIS MATTER COME FROM? IN THAT FORM?.... The GAS theory States there was NO SPACE only MATTER.... There is SOMETHING matter! space is NO-THING, nothing, a "void" SO matter could have CREATED space The GAS THEORY states that a GAS, (1/infinite times a Helium atom(or any particle), = (matter MINUS space)) was the original substance, a property-less gas, that had POTENTIAL energy. Ironically only because it was substance and had mass.... This GAS was... At a single volume, pressure, and temperature. First the GAS condensed some. Space was created by this. A VOID was opened. 100%matter--- "?"% ??%matter/??%space (75/25) Then the GAS developed some properties... 1st the(variation) of volume, CREATED the WEAK FORCE from Vacuum/MATTER 2nd (variation)of pressure, CREATED GRAVITATION from condensation/MATTER 3rd (variation) of temperature, CREATED ELECTROMAGNETISM from heat and cold/MATTER 4th friction developed (KINETIC ENERGY) and CAUSED electrical activity,condensations and "dynamic cosmic relationships" A gaseous cloud of "microwave laden matter/energy reactions."? All these 1-4 CREATED the STRONG FORCE (HIGHLY KINETIC AND CONDENSED MATTER) which CAUSED spontaneous disintegration's and atomic radiation. All this lead to the universe as we know it.. You see Space was/(may have been) CREATED FROM a void in matter 1/INFINITE TIMES HELIUM OR(ANY PARTICLE) Matter which we know exists and is the basis for all things remains the foundation of all things.... With the BIG BANG nothing must become something With GAS THEORY matter CREATES SPACE from a void in MATTER the events that are described are "reasonable and logical" JE Bressman Because there is something. (Matter) If there were nothing even nothing is something.. However, if there were nothing then life would not exist. The New Math... (n = "infinite quantity" any number not 0 not negative 1/n x of a helium atom = a gas (matter)) The universe, calculated at the starting point = n/1 matter and 1/n space + (n/1)energy +time "so n/1 matter/ 1/n space + n/1 energy will equal 1/n matter/ n/1 space - n/1 energy +time" this is the gas theory math SPOKEN .... ""infinite matter and little space equals infinte space and little matter with energy being the reactant" OR matter/space plus energy plus time equals space/matter minus energy minus time" The gas theory

Answer 1

So you're saying that a super thin gas was the original stuff?
That's what I reading...
The Math n/1/1/n clever, brilliant really, I mean it could be....
I mean think about it its all very clear
matter + energy + time= space + matter - energy
I don't know how thin this Gas would be though likely very thin...

Answer 2

Wow! You need to get out more.

Especially after sending me an email arguing that "since nothing can be described, it is something".
Do you write bad checks?
Do you argue with your bank that since a bank balance of "$0.00 is a number it has value and you can therefore write a personal check on it? It is the same reasoning. The number is only a place holder. It is an identifier so that we can refer to a bank balance of "nothing".
It is the same with the word "nothing".
Without the word, we could not talk about "nothing".
It would be impossible do describe.
Seven letters in a word does not assign any value . Only an egghead with a brain full of worthless numbers would assume otherwise. Intelligence is not a brain full of facts. Facts without wisdom are worthless. You need to be able to use the facts productively.
Duh!
I realize that some people are not able to grasp the concept of pure nothingness and therefore try to change to into something they can comprehend. It is similar to arguing the earth is flat because they cannot see the spherical characteristics of it. Greater minds have moved beyond such foolishness.

Your second sentence is flawed when you say even "nothing is something:"
Nothing is the absence of all possibilities. Nothing can only be considered as "something" in thought, not in actuality. You are considering that nothing exists, but the fact remains that nothing does not exist.

Non-existence can only be conceived and experienced in the mind. Even the universe does not exist without your mind to perceive it. The universe itself is not a giant expanse of matter and energy. The universe is nothing more than a giant thought.

You will learn that when you proceed beyond physics (the physical sciences) to the quantum level. The general laws of math, physics, and relativity do not apply in the quantum field of all possibilities. The laws and the associated events and circumstances are not static. They are transient, fluid, and elusive. A single quantum particle can been observed in two distinctly different places at the exact moment in time in the laboratory now, therefore even math is not an exact science in the quantum soup (1+1=1). Subsequently, the formulations in your composition do not apply. They are thrown completely out the existential window of mind.

Time and space do not exist. They are maya , illusion.
-Tao Barbie

"Time and space are modes in which we think, and not conditions in which we live." -Albert Einstein

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
-Albert Einstein

Peace out!

.

Answer 3

I attended this Scientific Symposium not long ago..very interesting!

Might want to check out this synopsis of The Electric Universe..

What Big Bang?
The Big Bang is already dead! The unheralded "Galileo of the 20th century", Halton Arp, has proven that the universe is not expanding. The Big Bang theory is based on a misinterpretation of redshift. The redshift of a distant galaxy is measured in the light coming from that galaxy. Lines in the spectrum of that galaxy show a shift toward the red compared with the same lines from our Sun. Arp discovered that high and low redshift objects are sometimes connected by a bridge or jet of matter. So redshift cannot be a measure of distance. Most of the redshift is intrinsic to the object. But there is more: Arp found that the intrinsic redshift of a quasar or galaxy took discrete values, which decreased with distance from a central active galaxy. In Arp's new view of the cosmos, active galaxies "give birth" to high redshift quasars and companion galaxies. Redshift becomes a measure of the relative ages of nearby quasars and galaxies, not their distance. As a quasar or galaxy ages, the redshift decreases in discrete steps, or quanta.

The huge puzzle for astrophysicists is why a galaxy should exhibit an atomic phenomenon. So we turn to particle physics. This difficulty highlights the fact that quantum "mechanics" applied to atoms is a theory without physical reality. The weirdness of quantum theory has been attributed to the subatomic scale to which it applies. But now that we have quantum effects in something the size of a galaxy, this convenient nonsense is exposed. If Arp is right many experts are going to look very silly. His discovery sounded the alarm in some halls of Academe and since nobody likes a loud noise - particularly if they are asleep - the knee-jerk response was to attack the guy with his finger on the alarm button. Arp's telescope time was denied, papers rejected, and he was forced to leave the US to pursue his work.

The Electric Universe

The Electric Universe model is a coherent "Big Picture" of our situation in the universe, spanning many disciplines. It highlights repeated electrical patterns at all scales that enable laboratory experiments to explain the strange, energetic events seen, for example, in deep space, on the Sun, and on Jupiter's moon, Io. The Electric Universe works backward in time using observations rather than forward from some idealised theoretical beginning. It provides simple answers to problems that are now clothed in fashionable metaphysics and mysticism. It is more interdisciplinary and inclusive of information than any prior cosmology. It points to practical possibilities far beyond the limits set by current science.


Read the complete Synopsis here:

Answer 4

the belief being set right now is that 2 membranes collided from diverse dimensions. yet that would pass away you lower back to same question, the place did the membranes come from? some have faith that the universe will cave in lower back, reason mass gravitational pull, than boost "yet another massive bang" and start up throughout. in case you think in an more suitable being (which I do) which will nonetheless lead you to the place did he come from. i think of you will tension your self loopy over those issues. you in basic terms would desire to take with no attention that what you're thinking of is area-time. In physics we use those for occasion rules, yet time does not exist outdoors of singularity, with a view to chat. It a around flow quite than a linear one.

Answer 5

Anybody care to calculate the crackpot index of this post?
See reference. The highest *documented* index will have my vote for best answer.

Answer 6

Sorry, dude! You gotta be high on something pretty strong to appreciate that kind of "logic". I've got both feet on the ground, so it's meaningless to me.

Answer 7

Crapola