Saddam provided shelter for Al Qaeda operatives. While Saddam wasn't directly responsible for 9/11, nobody can deny that Iraq was a supporter of terrorism.
2007-07-02 12:40:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by x 4
·
1⤊
8⤋
Honestly....I don't think anyone can blame a country. 9/11 happened from a group of people who thought their actions were a work of righteousness....and I am sure those who still believe that way will continue in their mission to destroy life. I feel we have a right to protect ourselves but I don't feel it our right to kill innocent lives in behalf of bring the terrorist group to justice. I honestly can say....I have no idea what is going on with our war in Iran or those other country's we are policing I want to know the truth but most wars and acts of blood shed are done in darkness and secrecy...there is a million factors along with a million opinions of who is right and who is wrong....I wish I could figure it out....I just want to support the side of righteousness....what ever side that is
2007-07-03 10:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only the people who believe Fox News tells the truth
2007-07-04 10:54:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by xg6 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called denial. Or displacement: the real culprit is elsewhere . Why blame bin Laden or shift the billions spent in Iraq to capture him?
2007-07-02 21:09:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Letizia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont its not all of iraqs fualt that they had some bad eggs more than bad but anyways you cant blame everyone because there was some horrible people...even considerering what happened and i bet! that if people knew that they were going to do that some good soul would have stopped them before it went to far!
2007-07-02 19:47:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by SEBchick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think Iraq was responsible cause everybody didn't know about the plot except those men.
2007-07-02 19:42:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by purposeborn_08 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
probably the same 26% of the country that thinks Bush is doing a great job.
hey exposing liberals(part of the 26% I just spoke of)-do your homework, I dont' know where you got that crap from, but anyway. Saddam's Iraq was a secular state. he was the true power, not like the Theocracies (Iran) and the ideologies supported by AL-Qaeda. Saddam was a tyrrant who wouldn't stand for rouge cells like Al-Qaeda challenging his authority in his country. One of Al-Qaeda's stated goals was to not only topple the US but also secular Islamic states in the region to instate Theocracies, run by Sharia (Islamic law)
2007-07-02 19:40:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Myles D 6
·
7⤊
1⤋
I do not. We knew where Saddam was and now look at the mess we are in. We should never have gotten this involved. We should have concentrated on Afghanistan.
2007-07-02 20:39:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by 1saintofGod 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not me, it boggles my mind that the administration would make such a claim
Saddam was sunni, Al-qaeda is Shi'a and as we can ALL see in Iraq, they hate each other very much
2007-07-02 19:41:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bill 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
nobody ever did. it was more about will they be responsible for the next one, and we never gave them a chance to. if they were even going to. i don't care really what's done is done, so we might as well finish whatever we decided was the reason we're still there.
2007-07-02 19:54:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by FengHuaXueYue 6
·
0⤊
1⤋