The only thing that has left Lewinski's mouth that was accually worth a thought was,"Who do I hafta blow to get this guy impeached?"
The republicans found a democrat with alot of cash in his fridge and are using this to say,"hey look everybody,the democrats have a crook too!" Wow.Thank Kenneth Star Fan Club for again spending millions to find A crook.When I ask the republicans about what BUSH has done for americans, it's always the same thing.They try answering the question with another question."Would you prefer Clinton?"
Well not that he could run again but if he could...uh,yeah,and you know he wouldn't have to rig the election to win either. And then for some reason I'd be misdirected into talking about his impeachment over lying about his infidelity instead of getting to the original question,"what has BUSH...."
So how many illegal attrosoties and lies must republicans get away with and aquire to equal one democratic marital faux pas? Okay,Heads out of the s-and...........NOW.
2007-07-02
12:15:05
·
7 answers
·
asked by
TODD H
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Clinton should have been impeached for lying under oath.
Bush should be impeached for
(1) repeatedly allowing his subordinates to lie to Congress.
(2) lying about WMDs to get us into a war.
(3) deliberating misleading us about an Iraq-9/11 connection.
(4) prolonging a senseless war with no military mission
(5) authorizing unconstitutional warrantless wiretaps
(6) ordering illegal torture of prisoners
(7) conspiring to suppress legitimate voters
But he won't be impeached, because the Democrats love him. Nobody elected more Democrats than W.
2007-07-02 13:04:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ray Eston Smith Jr 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
technically bush has done nothing -- you can't impeach a do nothing. cheney on the other hand is ripe pickings as is the rest of his cabinet -- but you can't impeach bush just because hes a stupid mindless idiot. there are also too many psycho fascists outside the cabinet that run free -- like john yoo for whom a timely end similar to goebbels would be kharmic. i just can't picture bush and laura hunkered in a bunker though.
2007-07-02 19:31:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"When I ask the republicans about what BUSH has done for americans, it's always the same thing."
who's head is in the sand? all you have to do is search for it on the exact site you are on right now
During his first term, Bush sought and obtained Congressional approval for three major tax cuts in 2001, 2002, and 2003. These cuts reduced taxes for almost every taxpayer, including reducing the lowest tax bracket, increasing the child tax credit, and eliminating the so-called “marriage penalty”. However, cuts were distributed disproportionately to higher income taxpayers (through a decrease in marginal rates) and complexity was increased with new categories of income taxed at different rates and new deductions and credits. At the same time, the number of individuals subject to the alternative minimum tax increased since the AMT remained unchanged.
Federal spending in constant dollars increased under Bush by 26% in his first four and one-half years. The tax cuts, a recession, and significant increases in military and domestic outlays all contributed to record budget deficits during the Bush administration, but ya gotta remember, its a war.
Inflation under Bush has remained near historic lows at about 2–3% per year, where it has been since the 1990s.
Private employment (seasonally adjusted) originally decreased under Bush from 111,680,000 in December 2000 to 108,250,000 in mid-2003. The economy then added private jobs for 25 consecutive months from (July 2003 to August 2005), and the private employment seasonally adjusted numbers increased as of June 2005 when it reached 111,828,000. Considering population growth, that still represents a 4.6% decrease in employment since Bush took office.
In January 2006, the government reported that first-time jobless claims fell to their lowest level in more than five years to 291,000, a sign that the national labor market continues to shake off the effects of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma.
Under Bush, the seasonally adjusted Unemployment Rate based on the Household Survey started at 4.7% in January 2001, peaked at 6.2% in June 2003, and retreated to 4.8% in February 2006.
Most recently, in the first quarter of 2006, the economy under Bush grew at a 4.8% pace, the best showing since the third quarter of 2003 when annualized growth was 7.2%
Whats the matter? would you guys rather just take MSNBC's word for everything? Believe all the propaganda that you hear? come on....use ur OWN mind for once.....
2 months ago - Report Abuse
2007-07-02 19:22:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
When one of you I hate Bush losers come forward with an impeachable offense, I will gladly jump on thebandwagon. So far he has not, and I hate Bush, is not a crime you can impeach him for.
2007-07-02 20:28:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by hugahugababy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
OK, first off, you really need a dictionary -- for spellings as well as meanings. Second, give me one crime he or his "cronies" have actually committed (at any rate, wouldn't the President himself have to do it in order to be impeached?). I was completely unaware that unpopularity was criminal.
2007-07-03 03:13:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Richard S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look, I never backed the Clinton impeachment thing. Clinton's crimes did not rise to the level of impeachment.
Clinton was guilty of committing perjury in a civil rights case (Paula Jones sexual harrassment suit).
What crime has Bush committed to earn an impeachment?
2007-07-02 19:20:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Uncle Pennybags 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Because the elite support him. He puppets their will.....
2007-07-02 19:20:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chaoticfreedoms 3
·
3⤊
1⤋