English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hayden

2007-07-02 12:02:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

He is not undercover and therefore there is no "outing".

Plame was not under cover either as she had ridden a desk since 1998, which put her outside of the coverage of the law.

What I cannot understand, this is fact, verifiable by an idiot and a keyboard and yet the stinking Socialists keep spewing their lies about this.

2007-07-02 12:50:01 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2 1

Of course not, I think the CIA subs out the personnel files to
Saudi Arabia.

2007-07-02 19:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Dr Doom 4 · 2 2

Neo-cons can't hide this fact nor call the link "liberal media".

Even treason bears no weight in the eyes of Republicans.


"Hearing Examines Exposure of Covert CIA Agent Valerie Plame Wilson's Identity"

2007-07-02 19:08:06 · answer #3 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4 4

Nope, do now though.

Need a place to hide? I cook pastry's...and plus, just got my student loans in, so I have food now!

2007-07-02 19:27:50 · answer #4 · answered by Peanutbutter Goddess ~ PM! 3 · 1 0

You don't even understand what crime was committed. Yet you post a sarcastic remark embracing a corrupt action by a corrupt administration. This seems to be the norm with the majority of Bush supporters. They do zero research for themselves. Just watch fox news and follow blindly.

2007-07-02 19:11:55 · answer #5 · answered by usefulidiot230 3 · 3 5

Of course not. But "outing" an undercover agent is against the law and, in my opinion, should be punished severely.

2007-07-02 19:07:28 · answer #6 · answered by kearneyconsulting 6 · 7 3

Um, you didn't out anyone. But the Bush administration did out an UNDERCOVER CIA agent, which is against the law. Do you understand the difference?

2007-07-02 19:04:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9 5

Yes I did. However,


"Valerie Wilson was no analyst or paper-pusher. She was an operations officer working on a top priority of the Bush Administration. Armitage, Rove and Libby had revealed information about a CIA officer who had searched for proof of the President's case. In doing so, they harmed her career and put at risk operations she had worked on and foreign agents and sources she had handled.


Valerie Plame was recruited into the CIA in 1985, straight out of Pennsylvania State University. After two years of training to be a covert case officer, she served a stint on the Greece desk, according to Fred Rustmann, a former CIA official who supervised her then. Next she was posted to Athens and posed as a State Department employee. Her job was to spot and recruit agents for the agency. In the early 1990s, she became what's known as a nonofficial cover officer. NOCs are the most clandestine of the CIA's frontline officers. They do not pretend to work for the US government; they do not have the protection of diplomatic immunity. They might claim to be a businessperson. She told people she was with an energy firm. Her main mission remained the same: to gather agents for the CIA.

In 1997 she returned to CIA headquarters and joined the Counterproliferation Division. (About this time, she moved in with Joseph Wilson; they later married.) She was eventually given a choice: North Korea or Iraq. She selected the latter. Come the spring of 2001, she was in the CPD's modest Iraq branch. But that summer--before 9/11--word came down from the brass: We're ramping up on Iraq. Her unit was expanded and renamed the Joint Task Force on Iraq. Within months of 9/11, the JTFI grew to fifty or so employees. Valerie Wilson was placed in charge of its operations group.

There was great pressure on the JTFI to deliver. Its primary target was Iraqi scientists. JTFI officers, under Wilson's supervision, tracked down relatives, students and associates of Iraqi scientists--in America and abroad--looking for potential sources. They encouraged Iraqi émigrés to visit Iraq and put questions to relatives of interest to the CIA. The JTFI was also handling walk-ins around the world. Increasingly, Iraqi defectors were showing up at Western embassies claiming they had information on Saddam's WMDs. JTFI officers traveled throughout the world to debrief them. Often it would take a JTFI officer only a few minutes to conclude someone was pulling a con. Yet every lead had to be checked.

"We knew nothing about what was going on in Iraq," a CIA official recalled. "We were way behind the eight ball. We had to look under every rock." Wilson, too, occasionally flew overseas to monitor operations. She also went to Jordan to work with Jordanian intelligence officials who had intercepted a shipment of aluminum tubes heading to Iraq that CIA analysts were claiming--wrongly--were for a nuclear weapons program. (The analysts rolled over the government's top nuclear experts, who had concluded the tubes were not destined for a nuclear program.)

The JTFI found nothing. The few scientists it managed to reach insisted Saddam had no WMD programs. Task force officers sent reports detailing the denials into the CIA bureaucracy. The defectors were duds--fabricators and embellishers. (JTFI officials came to suspect that some had been sent their way by Ahmad Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress, an exile group that desired a US invasion of Iraq.) The results were frustrating for the officers. Were they not doing their job well enough--or did Saddam not have an arsenal of unconventional weapons? Valerie Wilson and other JTFI officers were almost too overwhelmed to consider the possibility that their small number of operations was, in a way, coming up with the correct answer: There was no intelligence to find on Saddam's WMDs because the weapons did not exist. Still, she and her colleagues kept looking. (She also assisted operations involving Iran and WMDs.)

When the war started in March 2003, JTFI officers were disappointed. "I felt like we ran out of time," one CIA officer recalled. "The war came so suddenly. We didn't have enough information to challenge the assumption that there were WMDs.... How do you know it's a dry well? That Saddam was constrained. Given more time, we could have worked through the issue.... From 9/11 to the war--eighteen months--that was not enough time to get a good answer to this important question."

When the Novak column ran, Valerie Wilson was in the process of changing her clandestine status from NOC to official cover, as she prepared for a new job in personnel management. Her aim, she told colleagues, was to put in time as an administrator--to rise up a notch or two--and then return to secret operations. But with her cover blown, she could never be undercover again. Moreover, she would now be pulled into the partisan warfare of Washington. As a CIA employee still sworn to secrecy, she wasn't able to explain publicly that she had spent nearly two years searching for evidence to support the Administration's justification for war and had come up empty."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060918/corn

2007-07-02 19:16:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Can someone show me where she was an undercover agent? I thought she was non-field personel.
I am not baiting, I just thought she was not a field agent.....

2007-07-02 19:07:31 · answer #9 · answered by Ken C 6 · 2 3

If he's covert, YES.

Since he's OBVIOUSLY not...No.

But then again Libby was CONVICTED OF PERJURY, not ''outing'' V. Plame.

2007-07-02 19:08:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers