After running on the fact that he was a man of God and of integrity. Bush has presided over the most criminal administration ever. Now, a convicted felom let go for nothing but political reason. Shame on Bush and shame on anyone who supports his presidency.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070702/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_leak_trial
2007-07-02 11:20:43 · 12 answers · asked by Frank R 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jeremy's response is typical of conservatives. When you don't like a question just change the subject. What does that have to do with the Bush junta that is dragging this country down the tubes. He is still president for more than a year what else can he do?
2007-07-02 11:27:28 · update #1
There is absolutely no reason to assume that George W. Bush is not ashamed.
But the only people who don't see this as shameful are the twenty-some percent of Americans who still support George W. Bush. (Some of whom have already answered this question, and possibly called you an idiot.)
I think what's really sad are the people who will argue that this is fine, or at least not that bad because of things that Clinton did.
How sad is it that they spent 1992-2000 complaining about Clinton, then have spent the last seven years using Clinton as an excuse for whatever screw-ups their sad president gets involved with.
The fact is, immorality is immorality. The Democrats have learned this the hard way, and it looks like the Republicans will learn it that way as well.
2007-07-02 13:36:42 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Bad Day 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Bush is the most corrupt, most dishonorable person (I stop short in crediting him with being a man) to ever serve as president of this great country. This latest bit of news should surprise no one, because Libby was a loyal Bushy and loyalty is all Bush cares about. If you disagree with him, b-bye - just ask former secretary of treasury Paul O'Neill, the most honorable man to serve in Bush's cabinet and the first to be ejected from his seat by a rogue tandem of Bush and Cheney, who deserve to spend some hard time in jail for all of the lies and underdealings and for basically taking the White House and our nation hostage in order to impose their own warped agenda on the now-turmoiled world.
2007-07-02 21:42:49 · answer #2 · answered by Bemarian 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
accusations and interpretations of events,,,nothing can be proven against Bush.nothing but blind party loyalty,,now whats wrong with that,,,are you not American,Bush loves me Ted Haggard says so...and the news is but a loath in the dark...falling on the pieces **** that profile the pitch...what the heck does shame mean these days anyway...cheers,,and hail bush,,,,I THINK,,,,,,
2007-07-02 19:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by freepress 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't appear that way.
Yet the first time I've ever agreed with anything he's wanted to do was with the new Immigration bill.
Hopefully something will come of that soon.
Even though I'm counting the days until his days are up, I'm also scared about who will take over his throne and what tricks they will ultimately have up their sleeve..
2007-07-02 18:39:14 · answer #4 · answered by (no subject) 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He has no shame is right. Especially when it comes to the COA(cover own azz). Bush is simply buying Libbys silence. Truth be told Libby could probably burn Cheney and Bush to a crisp. They had all this worked out when it first became public.
You gotta try and take care of your fallguy. This gives me faith that there is still honor among thieves.
2007-07-02 19:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yep.
You should have been in the country during the Clinton Adminstration.
The Clintons were even more corrupt than Nixon, LBJ, and JFK.
Now that's Corruption, honey.
There's not a corrupt bone in Bush's body. Even the Democrats will tell you that....after the 2008 election. (Until then, they have to put on a "show" for the little gullible Democrat Voters.)
Come down here to Little Rock, honey. And ask Questions about the Clintons. See what happens to you. (You'd better bring a couple of bodyguards.)
2007-07-02 18:25:41 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Of course he has no shame. He blatantly does whatever he wants and labels any who don't cower in awe of him a traitor. It is mind boggling that people still support the man at this point.
2007-07-02 18:24:26 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Pathological liars are rarely capable of shame.
2007-07-02 18:26:54 · answer #8 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
dont blame bush for the war blame the commander in chief
2007-07-02 18:39:54 · answer #9 · answered by lchoops 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why wasn't Clinton charged for doing the same?
2007-07-02 18:25:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋