Should be charged with child endangerment and the child taken away. After she has served her jail time she should have to go to inpatient rehab and then once out in the world she should have to undergo one year of drug testing and supervision, she must hold down a job throughout that year and maintain a livable environment before she is able to get her child back.
2007-07-02 11:15:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lori B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say rehab, but sometimes the best rehab is prison, if some one is abusing a substance while pregnant, they have a serious problem, this is not the 80's no one can claim ignorance of crack baby's or any other substance damaged children. these are not casual users, these are serous addicts, when your and addicted to something it is a sickness, but if your still calling it a friend, you need people to convince you otherwise (aka rehab), but if your particularly stubborn in your belief, then some more serious convinces (aka prison) unfortunately prison can be a easy place to get drugs these days so i would give them rehab first. maybe even with the promise of one day after a very log list of things has been accomplished: In A.A., have job, have place to live, dry for a year, and being followed up on with a dfacts officer, a addiction counselor, and a psychologist to try to get to the core issue of what hole the booze was trying to fill and address that
2007-07-02 11:22:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree that smoking or ingesting mutually as pregnant is incorrect, yet no, we can't enforce rules to avert pregnant women from doing those issues. initially, in many countries women are even pronounced by their OBs to have a tumbler of wine a night. i in my view does not take that hazard, however the actuality is those international places do no longer practice a greater robust prevalence of FAS than the U.S. the place this is thoroughly discouraged. throughout the time of the 70's pregnant women smoked freely with little information of the available undesirable outcomes on their babies. some babies have been born small and with respiratory circumstances and subsequently this is not reliable, yet once you talk approximately that thousands and thousands of girls did this (and this is nonetheless greater basic in different international places), the kind of youngsters effected is quite small. As a mom I say a woman might desire to do each thing to attempt to guarantee the wellness of her infant. As an American citizen, i comprehend this is not my perfect to tell yet another woman what to do together with her own physique. If cigarettes and alcohol are legal for each guy or woman, we don't get to cut back particular communities of persons. that's no longer the way the form works.
2016-10-03 10:46:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that pregnant women who choose to abuse drugs and alcohol should have their child taken away immediately at birth. This should be enough punishment. If they care, they themselves will enroll in a rehab and if not then they will probably end up in jail anyways.
2007-07-02 11:19:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definite imprisonment. How dare a woman decide whether or not her, otherwise completely healthy child, is going to be healthy or sick, dead, disabled or deformed because she wants to abuse drugs? Its not right. Babies of drug users are victims. Although they may be considered "fetus' " they are still innocent children who deserve a heatlthy chance at life.
2007-07-02 11:20:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by SheSoFly 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have mixed feelings about it. I'm very strongly pro-choice, because I believe that all people should have complete autonomy over their own persons. That being said, though, I think that if a woman wants to keep drinking, she shouldn't get pregnant or stay pregnant. It's unfair to the child!
2007-07-02 11:15:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rehab by way of prison.
2007-07-02 11:12:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by only p 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rehab. Then they can seek employment.
2007-07-02 11:30:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
THey need both!
2007-07-02 11:12:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋