9/11 happened 8 months into Bush's term & they blame Clinton for not doing anything. If the next president is a Democrat and a terrorist attack happens 8 months into his or her term, would they blame Bush?
2007-07-02 07:02:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
They're tracking your internet activity and for asking this question they will blame you. Look out.
2007-07-02 10:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by Megan B 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Probably, Bush already gets blamed for everything. Besides, just like 9/11, 8 months in is not much time to do anything. Both sides made mistakes in lead up to the attacks. and let's be honest, we are not going to be able to stop all attacks all the time, we love to play the blame game, how about blaming the terrorists, rather than it alway's being America's fault.
http://www.dryflypolitics.com
2007-07-02 15:24:50 · answer #2 · answered by sbay311 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Apples and Oranges, pointing out that Clinton did nothing and the terrorists had been in the US for years training for 9/11 somehow offends your liberal sensabilities. There are much tighter security measures in place now, Homeland Security, being the main one , along with a heightened awareness of the threat. You can play the blame game all you want, but it doesn't change history. But the Clintons are experts at revisionist history, so maybe they can cover most of it up. Whatever Sandy Berger didn't steal and destroy for them , anyway.
2007-07-02 14:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is not a cognitive rationalization. Bush is actually trying to do something to stop terrorism. I would still blame the terrorists for their actions and if Bush was doing nothing about it like Clinton, I would blame him for not making an effort to deter it.
2007-07-02 14:05:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I personally blame the terrorist for 911. I also know that they will try it again if we ever let our guard down. We had numerous terror attacks not only in this country but all around the world before this administration and I think we are doing the right thing. Now if you get in our way you will be responsible so I recommend you stay out of the way of their work.
2007-07-02 14:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actually, we don't blame Clinton. We blame the terrorists and have sent our military to kill terrorists.
But I guess you think thats a bad idea?
2007-07-02 14:09:47 · answer #6 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course not. They will blame the democrats for trying to clean up what the republicans messed up for 8 years....great question.
2007-07-02 18:02:32 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I blame all the idiots in Washington.
They're too busy pandering for money and votes to care about America....
Seriously - what has this "great" new Congress done, now that the Dems are in power? Jack squat. About as much as the GOP controlled Congress got done....
We have too many of them campaigning for the 2008 election (more than a YEAR away) than working for the American people.
2007-07-02 14:07:11 · answer #8 · answered by KAVE 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
you are incorrect , they blame the terrorist , which happens to be a threat dems haven't realized yet so they blame their own leaders
2007-07-02 14:06:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Clinton did nothing about osama even after:
-two embassies were bombed
-the u.s.s. cole was attacked
-clinton knew where he was in sudan
2007-07-02 17:42:24 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋