who thinks this is stupid? yeah he had a bad year but was still 3rd on the team with points. His first two years, in my opinion, where pretty good. 27 points in his rookie year and 46 points in 58 games in his second. If you look at last year just being a bad year(as it was for every flyer) and if he continues where he was going, you figure he is good for about 65(46/58*82) points what is what the top Dmen are getting.
True he made a lot of deffensive errors but playing with the experienced kimmo would do a crapload of help and make him a lot better.
Oh as for the trade, they got smith and lupul for pitkanen and sanderson. Sanderson showed he still had something left last year but could just never finish the plays. He really just had that one pretty long hot streak but then he was done for the season. Plus he is getting older so i can see why we got rid of him.
But i dont really know much about lupul or smith so fill me in on what you think about them and/or the trade
2007-07-02
03:35:50
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Nate!
2
in
Sports
➔ Hockey
so basically,
sanderson for lupul does nothing but change the name on the back of one of our players jersey
pitkanen for smith trades
-young for old
-inexperience for experience
-offensvie "defensemen" for defensive defensemen
-sloppy team work for leadership
if thats the case, its a good move i think
2007-07-02
04:05:29 ·
update #1