English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm trying to fill in a NOtice of Claim. Here's the story:
Company A Constructions hired E Electrics to do an electrical installation for Company B Foods. The work has been done but the installation fees have not been paid to E Electrics. Company A Constructions says that Company B Foods has not paid them so Company A cannot pay E Electrics. Company A Constructions is the General Contractor. Should Company B Foods be named as the sub-contractor of this claim???

2007-06-30 16:32:02 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

Company B is not a subcontractor, because they hired the main contractor company A. Company E is the subcontractor. Company E now has claims against both A and B. If A does not cough up, then B has to.

2007-06-30 16:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by Ronin 2 · 0 0

Co B Foods is not a sub contractor. Co E is. Co E should be paid according to the agreement with the General.

So is there a COD contract between General and CO E?

I would do nothing if the contract allows the General to withhold until he receives a payment from his client.

Have you done work for this General in the past and found him to be honest?

Lot's of variables means you will get a lot of wrong answers here.

2007-06-30 16:50:24 · answer #2 · answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers