need a persuasive conclusion for employee monitoring and the privacy of rights.?

Answer 1

if you're argument if FOR employee monitoring:
Because management cannot be everywhere all the time, they must select people to represent them and connect management to the customers. It is in management's (and the business') best interest to select people with outstanding respectable histories.

Answer 2

I don't believe in employee monitoring as it is an invasion of privacy and of civil rights. An employee's character and quality of work should speak for itself. If these things are suspect, then the employee could be given a warning, and if the situation continues, there is just cause for reprimand or termination. I know of no reason, however, why a good worker who doesn't waste time, fulfills his or her obligation to the employer, gets along well with others, is polite and respectful to co-workers and superiors, needs to be under secret and/or constant surveillance. If that ever happened to me on a job, I'd quit.