Fillmore by a long shot.
2007-06-30 14:48:06 · 10 answers · asked by flushles 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
1) It's rude to answer your own question on Y!A.
2) It's pathetic when you try to answer your own question & get the answer wrong.
George Walker Bush is much better & anyone not suffering from advanced BDS knows that.
2007-06-30 14:51:43 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
Millard Fillmore
2007-06-30 21:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Fillmore. Not once during his time in office were we ever attacked by muslim terrorists. Bush cannot say the same. Therefore, it is only logical to conclude that Fillmore was the stronger President and better suited to confront the threat.
.
2007-06-30 22:17:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Old Millard Fillmore did not disgrace us with an unwinnable war and twenty million illegals,I vote for Fillmore.
2007-06-30 21:59:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe that even a dead Millard Fillmore can do a better job than a live Dubya.
2007-06-30 21:57:50 · answer #5 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fillmore 20 million times over. Bush can't even find his way out of a wet paper bag.
2007-06-30 21:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by Lunnar 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Gee I don't know sense Fillmore was the thirteenth president. He was a little before my time and A LOT before your time Libby.
2007-06-30 21:56:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A bucket of dung would be better than Bush
2007-06-30 21:56:13 · answer #8 · answered by roy40371 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about who would be a better president:
George W. Bush or an inanimate carbon rod.
I vote for the rod
2007-06-30 21:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
millard installed the first bathtub in the white house,,,,,bush just clogged the toilets
2007-06-30 21:52:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋