Why no helmet?

Question

Why do some motorcyclists refuse to wear a helmet.

Im my opinion it is one of the easiest things you can do to greatly increase safety. They can save your life. Why not take the precaution?

Answer 1

I dont know. For a long time my state had no helmet law and I wore a Full Face lid the entire time, summer, winter when ever.

My dad hated wearing a helmet and for a long time quit when they enacted the helmet law just because he refused to wear one. One day while riding my little brothers dirtbike (without a helmet) he was riding along side the highway and hit a ditch that someone had dug recently. Landed square on his head after being thrown from the bike. He died later that night from swelling of the brain and even thoguh the doctors said he would have died even if he had been wearing a helmet, I am fairly certain they where just trying to comfort my mother.


My honest belife that the reason some people refuse to wear a helmet is just becuase they do not want to be told what they should do.

Answer 2

Naw I wouldn't say greatly. Even the gov. statistics only claim a life saved in about 30% of the accidents. The helmet would have to be the size of a beach ball to really give you the cushioning effect needed to give your head the time and space needed to slow down and not come to an abrupt stop. Like they say it aint the fall that kills ya its the sudden stop. your brain cant handle that. Youll do more to improve your survivability by practicing defensive riding to the extent of paranoia .

Answer 3

Why do car and truck drivers refuse to wear a helmet?? Think of all the lives that would be saved. If a car's safety cage protects the driver so that he doesn't need a helmet, then why do all race-car drivers wear one??

Answer 4

It is all about choice. In fact you still have a choice regardless of what state you live or ride in. Many people choose to speed everyday. More than a few bikers choose to ride lidless in states with helmet laws.

Grow up and mind your own business.

Next nannies will beg the government to use force of law to regulate what foods you may eat or not.

Answer 5

Because they have the choice to wear one or not. I always wear a helmet, but the state I live in doesn't require that I do, and I'm glad that I can choose for myself. Lots of things people do carry risks, most are preventable, but just because states can legislate everything, including matters of personal choice, it doesn't mean that they should.

Answer 6

Very simple, personal preference. Both sides can give all the reasons they want why there should or should not be helmet laws. It just does not matter. I am of a mind that if you want to wear one, do it. If not fine Either way leave the other side alone, and just ride.

Answer 7

sure, helmets keep lives... yet no longer donning one is a danger that a biker takes. Bikers take hazards. in the event that they did no longer, they prob would not trip bikes. whilst you're an experienced rider, driving in ninety degree climate, you're able to pick to no longer positioned on a helmet. females pick to KILL fetuses (and that's criminal), so why shouldn't riders pick to danger their own lives?! I see no reason regulations could intervene with this. Now on your query... "do you think of its easy that cutting-edge regulation helps the kinfolk of a bike crash sufferer to sue the motive force of the different motor vehicle for wrongful dying, etc. in situations the place reason replaced into the two twin fault or no fault, and a helmet could have stored the sufferer's existence?" ... A courtroom could settle on who replaced into at fault. If the motive force of a vehicle replaced into at fault for inflicting the twist of destiny... it is not suitable if the rider replaced into donning a helmet or no longer. The helmet project is irrelivent. moreover, DRIVERS are extra secure on the line than bikers... even bikers who positioned on helmets. The kinfolk of a ineffective biker could take the case to courtroom and sue in the event that they are able to. twin fault as an example, a vehicle hit a helmet-much less biker that replaced into driving on the line in a turn... it is not easy to assert, yet i do no longer think of it rather is incorrect fot the kinfolk to aim to SUE... enable the courtroom settle on... and lastly, a "No fault" twist of destiny could bring about no money for the kinfolk, certainly. Helmets can shield bikers, yet so can regulations. AMA is working on it.

Answer 8

i live in Arkansas no helmet except under 21 i don't wear one .

i been riding 41 years . its really not the helmet its people who don't even ride trying to tell me how to be safe .helmets cut down your hearing ,covers some of your seeing area
an they are hot an heavy on your head

i don't wear seat belts either even though we have a seat belt law

On helmet issue .t hey are supposed to pass dot specks .but a helmet haven't been tested to pass dot in over twenty years

so you know the helmet people are going to make them as cheap as they can

Answer 9

let those who ride decide. ohio is optional for those that have the endorsement for a year or more, and is over 18. i prefer to wear it just on the off chance of some dumbazz moron pulling out in front of me. it doesnt require u going 60mph to splatter ur brains all over the road.....a 25 mph laydown can do the same thing.

Answer 10

Some people don't wear helmets because they think its not "Cool" to wear helmets. Still, some people just don't wear it because its uncomfortable or they don't really want to buy one. I myself don't wear a helmet because I just don't like them.