2007-06-30 10:02:36 · 19 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no, Barack Obama is not corrupt.
2007-07-05 14:42:33 · answer #1 · answered by scarycatlady5 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, Kucinich is high-quality. Mike Gravel looks incredibly darn good too! Ron Paul has some good issues too say, yet I actually do no longer accept as true with him on each and every little thing. Dodd isn't undesirable the two. regrettably, none of those applicants are probable to win nominations. Granted, they seem to be a great way from acceptable, yet they seem to be a hell of so lots greater efficient than the favorites. yet, come election day, we are going to probable be caught finding out between 2 idiots back...the corporate pastimes, lobbyists, and the mainstream media (as Peace 4 All pronounced some posts above) will make valuable of that. we are going to have selections like Obama, Hillary, Romney, or that gutless, idiotic turd Giuliani. What'll ya have? A turd sandwich or a $hitburger? purely yet another wide-unfold election...
2016-11-07 19:57:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Corruption is a big word.Wouldn't call all the others corrupt as much as I'd call them in the pocket of some sort of special ,interest and big money.I'm not really sure if that makes them all corrupt.
Maybe he's the most ethical one running
2007-06-30 10:08:23 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Come on now! If he is well known, which he is, he is probably corrupt. One would need to look at how he got where he is today and who helped him attain his jobs. I can tell you, all of the candidates for both major parties are corrupt. I am just "biding time" to see if someone with no ties to politics as it now is, will run.
2007-06-30 10:09:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Barack Obama is one of only 12 senators who made
their list of their earmark requests public.
(6 senators had no earmarks, 6 submitted their requests)
I've listened to Kucinich & I like the guy, so I would have
to say Kuninich & Obama are most likely the least
corrupted.
2007-06-30 10:32:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kucinich is corrupted by his lunacy.
2007-07-07 06:16:21 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he the only Presidential candidate that we haven't figured out in what way he is corrupt.
2007-06-30 10:07:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
you ARE kidding right?? they are all corrupt, dems and pubs alike. its the nature of the beast. i wish it werent true but im afraid that it is. i just happen to think that the republican largess is far and away worse than the dems. also the fact that the republicans have the blood of 4 000 american troops, as well as untold 10s of thousands of iqaquis on their hands makes me not a fan of theirs.
2007-06-30 11:46:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, possibly the only one who is... at least in thought.
No, that's a stretch too. I'd have to fit Hillary in that camp.
Crap, and Obama ... and absolutely Edwards and Gore.
2007-06-30 10:06:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Seems like it, but he put Cleveland in the red some years ago....not president material in my eyes. :(
2007-06-30 10:07:06 · answer #10 · answered by Shortstuff13 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋