Do you believe that the US Military should be taken out of Iraq and sent to other places in the world where AlQaeda is a threat?
Please give me a Yes or No answer and then elaborate if you wish. Thanks.
2007-06-30 07:13:40 · 10 answers · asked by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes.
Iraq is a lost cause. The lack of planning for rebuilding the country made it an impossible task, and our troops aren't accomplishing much at this point. We would be much better off if our troops were spread out than concentrated in this one region where they're accomplishing very little.
2007-06-30 07:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
This should have been done in the first place.
After 9/11, bush had the sympathy of the world and could have created a worldwide coalition to combat AlQaeda. Yet he squandered this opportunity and invaded a country that had nothing to do with the attacks on the World Trade Center.
2007-06-30 14:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by R8derMike 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What the hell do you think their in now, you mean you don't think Iraq's a threat with Al Qaeda. They should be brought home to this beautiful America , who made us the Police of all nations, old nit wit Bush. We don't have to go anywhere they need to guard America not a bunch of no mads jumping up and down acting like the damn fool that they are. Let's protect our country , get New Orleans back on it's feet , get the MS coast operating full speed. For a change lets take care of our fellow Americana's I'm inclined to believe ,"Ever country for themselves". We have states torn up by tornado's that need help rebuilding , station our troops around the America borders just like Saddam did Iraq. Kill each terrorists as they cross and we'll be a hell of a lot better and our troops will be able to live again with their families.
2007-06-30 14:29:54 · answer #3 · answered by Nicki 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and no. Yes they should be taken out of Iraq but no they should not be sent to other places. We have "helped" all we can and it is time that countries start fending for themselves a little bit. Think about it. When we finally got sick of Britain pushing us around we rose up and fought our hearts out. We knew the land, we knew where to hide and we had a reason to fight. SO DOES IRAQ! They know the land, they know how and where to hide and they have a reason to fight. They need to do what we did and band together and fight together. It is so important for them to fight themselves because it will make them stronger in the end. We (USA) had our hearts in the right place i think and i think we really did want to help but the problem is that they don't exactly want it. maybe they did in the beginning but now they don't. so we need to back off. Plus we have problems here that we need to face and the only way we can do that is if we have the resources such as our military and national guard (which some of the states don't have right now because their national guard is in Iraq). So since everyone wants us out of their hair anyways, lets just oblige them and work on our own issues for awhile.
2007-06-30 14:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by VoteMo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should be removed from Iraq.. And no they should not be sent else where. The best defense against any terrorist activities in the US would be a solid and unified police and military intelligence program right here.
2007-06-30 14:31:37 · answer #5 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and no. I think they should be sent home and no they should not be sent to other regions where Al Queda may be at. America can't be the policemen for the entire world. If that's what they want us to do, then we need to go wherever needed and do what a NORMAL superpower would do - enter with NUKES and enough to do the job. We can't be playing "footsie" with these murderers anymore!
2007-06-30 14:21:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but only after substantial intellegence has been culled before committing troops to another exercise in futility.
In the meantime, "Stay the course" has been as effective as the Ram's "Prevent Defense" was when the Rams were in California...
2007-06-30 14:24:52 · answer #7 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I think we are in a state where we need to keep troops in Iraq, but unconventional warfare should be fought by unconventional means and that doesn't necessarily mean military.
2007-06-30 14:17:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
what was left of Al Qaeda was most likely destroyed during the attack on afghanistan. evidence suggest they were a small group and not a 'global network of terror'. the 'global network of terror' is pure fiction. so....whatever.
2007-06-30 23:48:13 · answer #9 · answered by gherd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
libs will follow them if they have AIDS
2007-06-30 14:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by GREAT_AMERICAN 1 · 0⤊ 6⤋