English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

with London car bomb??? what do you think? do you think its co Gordon Brown is the new PM and hes Scottish??

2007-06-30 06:46:56 · 23 answers · asked by Joanne S 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

23 answers

Yep all the work of scumbag muzzers

2007-06-30 06:49:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

On the surface its a bit odd..

the media reported two cars with explosives to cause signifcant damage thereby eliminating the possibility of this being just a coinidence and therefore terrorist attempt...then the supposition that this was to detonate by mobile phone...but where is the evidence as they hadnt even analysed the cars yets...

but this is what the police said or was reported by the media at the time of the 7/7 and then it later emerged that there were bombers on each train...

the pattern of the 7/7 is consistent with Islamic Jihad in that there were suicide bombers so saying there might have been remote detonation is more consisitent with ETA or the IRA...

so todays ramming connects the three incidents together and confirms that the plan was to ram these cars full of explosives into buildings thereby fulfilling JIHAD...it is like that the cell in Scotland did not know about the people in London but would have found out on the news..these three attempts are not a coincidence...

so from the fact that today we have a ginormous clue about yesterdays cars..the question is what went wrong in London...
there was an earlier report that the car have crash and been left ....did the car not restart or was there another problem? did the terrorist have another thought - naaaa - not worth it or were they scared...

but we do know from todays attack that yesterday there should have been two similar attacks but something went wrong..

if terrorist attempts like this are so wrong we would all be laughing at these people but because normally they get it right that we count ourselves lucky...

so why the errors? is it because they are younger and maybe between the ages of 17 and 23 and dont know any better througg insufficient preparation and knowledge?

2007-06-30 14:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by Pandora 5 · 0 1

US news media is saying that the Glasgow attack was by the same people who did the London bombs, that so far six culprits are in custody, police trying to track down more.

It is alleged that they are all doctors in Britain under some student visas, to learn medical techniques. I did not catch what Asian country they are supposedly from.

US news media is saying that the attack in Glasgow is because Gordon Brown is from Scotland.

There's a lot of discussion about the significance of the cars used in London. Previously car bombs have been in jalopies. So we interested to know if the cars were stolen, rented like the first Twin Towers bombing & Oklahoma City, or if all doctors drive that kind of car and don't realize it is kind of suspicious.

2007-07-02 02:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by Al Mac Wheel 7 · 0 0

Its fair to say they were both the work of terrorists but its got nothing to do with Muslims at all. There is nothing in their faith that condones this behaviour. To clarify, I'm white and Christian but I happen to know enough Muslims to know the difference between them and the lunatics that did these things. Glasgow Airport is an International Hub and is always likely to be a target unfortunately. Thank God no-one was seriously hurt ( not counting the attackers, they should have read Deploying A Flaming Jeep for Dummies before they got started) and God Bless John Smeaton for Scottish bravado beyond the call of duty.

2007-07-03 21:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by tara_365 3 · 0 0

Political Correctness is the Incubator of Islamism
by Amil Imani

14 Feb, 2007

Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.
With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?

Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.

Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us.

Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.

2007-06-30 23:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No doubt they are linked - but remember 'Al Queda' is not a traditional organisation, but made up of many independent cells - so the top down authority is not there as it is in some other groups. This has certain advantages, but can be a negative also - especially from an Ops point of view.

As to Brown, he still considers himself a bloody Brit, so no true Scot is he.

2007-06-30 14:01:33 · answer #6 · answered by gortamor 4 · 0 1

Well the first mercedes found in London started it's journey in Scotland. I'm surprised the news media hasn't mentioned that as a possible circumstantial link yet.

2007-06-30 14:01:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

linked...probably....since the timing was close to London incident.
Since the bombs in London did not go off the police have a TON of evidence.
And more evidence from Glasgow incident.
Authorities gonna have lot of trails to follow.

Muslim community gonna throw fits?

2007-06-30 14:15:20 · answer #8 · answered by zes2_zdk 3 · 1 0

i think it is linked as on the sky news website it says members of the public were removing gas canisters from the jeep that was alight but also on BBC news 24 a witness who works at the airport said the terroirst who set himself alight with the petrol was shouting "Allah" sorry if i have mis spelled the word no offence meant, which oh informs is the Islam God.

2007-06-30 14:02:00 · answer #9 · answered by mollymoosmummy 3 · 1 0

That's a good point. I wondered why they bothered bombing all the way up there instead of just London again.

2007-06-30 14:52:57 · answer #10 · answered by bruce 4 · 0 0

Looks highly likely given the sequential nature of the attacks. I doubt it has anything to do with Brown.

2007-06-30 16:30:12 · answer #11 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers