2007-06-30 06:34:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
if they were after causing destruction and death to innocent people then yes ofcourse.
if however, they wanted to catch the 5.35 to London.. not likely.
2007-06-30 06:38:34 · answer #1 · answered by emma m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. Maybe the situation would have been treated differently in the media, but it still a terrorist attack.
A terrorist attack is not called that because of who did, but why it was done.
2007-06-30 13:47:35 · answer #2 · answered by Erica 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes,If they were ideologically driven and targeted civilians like the Bosnian Serb snipers in Sarajevo.
2007-06-30 13:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by James O 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah, like people forget that timothy mcveigh and crew are/were terrorists, the nazis are terrorists, the kkk are terrorists, those animals who bombed churches wirth little kids inside, all straight up terrorists, lets not think that terror cant come in white skin now.
2007-06-30 14:48:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not being a minority or different race other than white changes everything but it all depends how massive was the destruction.
2007-06-30 13:38:21 · answer #5 · answered by Punkstar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not.
2007-06-30 13:47:42 · answer #6 · answered by MotherMayI? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋