Yes I totally agree with you , he is going to make his picture in the history even more darker , may be day we will forgive him for what he did in Iraq , but to get involved in Palestine that's a lose lose situation , he is insisting to go down to the bottom with that thing bush .
2007-06-30 06:27:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by hasafer 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
I think Blair is totally wrong for the position.
He is despised so much in the Middle East that the cost of his personal security must be about he same as the Palestinian Budget.
I really doubt if he will come out of this one smiling... if he comes out at all.
2007-07-01 19:08:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cilly Buggah 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Instead of complaining about Blair for helping to overthrow Saddam, lets hear something positive for people like Chemical Ali.
2007-06-30 13:31:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'd like to utilise TB's talents as well. Preferably as a decoy in Helmand district
2007-06-30 18:49:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by one shot 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, he had done enough damage here and in the Middle East they await for him with hate.
2007-06-30 15:07:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
So, why don`t YOU go to the Middle East and stand in the road appologising on his behalf, I`m sure YOU would be welcomed with open arms.
Not going huh...thought not!!!
2007-06-30 13:59:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It does seem like he is misplaced in this job. I recognize that you don't like him. but he is still a very articulate and persuasive speaker. The country should utilize his talents. In this area, he has a lot of baggage. I would use him as currency representative to the EU. He did some good things in that area, in my opinion.
2007-06-30 13:37:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Richard F 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
would you have the nerve to become a middle eastern peace envoy if you were one of the main instigators of a war in that area of the world?
2007-06-30 13:32:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by planet 2
·
5⤊
3⤋
He's a con man same as Bush, I'm surprise no one's questioning the timing on the bombs being found and the new PM saying he wants to back off from Iraq. Why didn't the bombs go off, by the way? Not very good terrorist if both of their bombs malfunction at the same time.
2007-06-30 13:28:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by naysayer 3
·
2⤊
5⤋
He could join Bush's daddy and become a new member of the Carlyle group, just like his predecessor did.
2007-06-30 13:32:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋