English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Ummm more than half the money people donate the government or "charity" benefits. Look at the Katrina fund. And you'd be crazy to think only 10,000 dollars iz gonna help one country in Africa. So nope and plus they are very profitable people it's just the wars crime and little battles that keeps them below.

2007-06-30 06:17:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Before you ask such a stupid question, please read a book. The white charities that are giving to Africa will never come close to what they took away from it. At the start of slavery, Africa was in line with the rest of the world as far as agriculture and technology. Slavery ruined communities and shattered lives which slowed down progress. And colonialism ruined what folks had managed to salvaged from slavery. The civil wars in African countries right now were in part caused by Colonialism...when Western Powers (the US not included) divided up Africa they gave no thought into how it was done. Countries were divided up by grid lines and not by cultures, languages, or religion. Africa was doing well, until western (white) powers stepped in so the fact that white charities are giving to Africa now seems like too little too late to me.

2007-07-01 02:51:08 · answer #2 · answered by Lish 2 · 1 0

I don't think "white" people help enough -- I don't know what you really mean by that. . .

I think people in general could do a hell of a lot more to help Africa. . . malaria alone - the medicine is easy for Americans to get and inexpensive -- there is no reason why they can't fly airplanes over Africa and drop it down for them .. .
Never mind all the other problems. . .
But then on the other side of the coin is this -- my friend was in the Peace Corps in Africa and they didn't want to hear about "birth control" or new ways to plant crops etc. . .they are set in their ways and they don't trust us too much that way. . . they have been living like this for thousands of years and they think they are right

2007-06-30 06:18:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No it is not true. Life would be different but Africa thought (by many scientists) to be the continent where mankind began, would definitely live on even without white man's charity. By the way there are many Africans because of whom many whites are alive today and many africans die because of the global warming and pollution most whites are thoughtlessly contributing to.

2007-06-30 06:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by smartobees 4 · 3 0

What charity? USA for africa 20 years ago were they kept most of the money?

2007-06-30 06:41:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Correct, which makes this 1 more brilliant example of how glorious white people are & how much the non-white world owes back to them in gratitude! Think maybe a white person made this claim??? HHMMmm? AND, IF Africa were to "die off" tomorrow, next year, or if it's been dead for 50years allready.... white man is the cold blooded murderer with the blood on their hands to show for it.~~~~~~~~~
Is it ALSO true that white people have hurt Africa A LOT more than they could ever help it? Ya think!!!???!
SO, as for ME, I dont give kudos, compliments & high-fives to whitey. Why do white people LOVE, i mean LOVE to pat themselves on the back & take credit that sure as HELL AINT due to them?!?! (cause they're crazy, i think;)

2007-06-30 07:53:38 · answer #6 · answered by Redrum 3 · 0 1

The existence of Africa precedes white influence therefore it is safe to assume that it would continue without it...

A body of land does not require a people in order to 'live'; people only contribute to a human society--how they maintain a balance within their environment determines how long the land may sustain them comfortably--or not...

If it were possible for a land to die, it would most probably be because of human intervention and a distinct disregard for preserving ecological balances...

2007-06-30 06:45:29 · answer #7 · answered by George A 5 · 2 0

FIRST OFF, you SEEM EXTREMLY SIMPLE-MINDED not to metion the fact the you used the word peoples in a sentence. I highly suggest you go back to the 7th grade take english and world history, followed by world economics. Then maybe you'll understand the situation in Africa. Also, use protection unless you wish to spread or contract the HIV virus!

2007-06-30 06:21:09 · answer #8 · answered by MzRaEd>>>>>Salti 3 · 1 0

Its your accountability as part of mankind. Please do not think of which you're doing me a prefer. i don't stay there in Africa. in case you prefer to help me, then supply up your racists from the blockades they're attempting to putting up for OUR President Obama who has finished alot for Blacks, Whites, and the USA of united states of america and attempting to circumvent progression right here in the USA of united states of america. Blacks geared up this united states of america besides because of the fact the White homestead and invented alot yet weren't known because of the fact at one time, it became the norm. You all are grateful for that nevertheless i'm confident...it became unfastened. You sholdn't even ask this until eventually Whites understand a thank you to get excitement from the different races and what we do (maximum cases being greater beneficial than WHites) for this united states of america.

2016-10-03 07:44:40 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Of course not. Even when there's nothing at all available and times are really bad, Africans are much more resourceful than most of the western world.Plus, their lives revolve around communities and not around themselves.Therefore they do, eventually, look after one another in one way or the next.

2007-06-30 06:29:42 · answer #10 · answered by Chelsearose. 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers