Remember George Bush led the UN to fight the first Iraq War but messed up the US economy. Bill Clinton came in, and improved the domestic performance; cut down crime rate and even let the Americans enjoyed an economy bloom in the late 90s. Now, George W. Bush fights the second Iraq War when almost everyone except the British said it is not the right time to do so in 2003, and again mess up the US economy; a lot worst than what his father did. So, do you think Hillary Clinton can again fix the Bush problem? She kind of has 8 years experience in the White House.
2007-06-30 04:12:18 · 15 answers · asked by Mr Siberia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Isn't it ironic - a clinton following a bush - TWICE. I think Hillary was the power behind Bill. She would be a FANTASTIC president. She would clean up the current Bush's mess and probably do it better than Bill. She will most definitely have the respect of the people and congress and she won't be on her knees in the oval office unless she dropped something. She's very smart but she also has common sense - which I don't think Bill had too much of. And, you have a point when you say she has 8 years experience. Heck - she's already been president once. Surely, she could do it a second time, better than before. :)
2007-06-30 11:51:08 · answer #1 · answered by Cathy D 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree 10000 percent with everything you said. It would be nice to live where the president hasnt been bush, clinton, bush, clinton, but I think that Hillary can fix some stuff in the USA. My vote is for Bill Richardson though. He is my governor, and he has changed the course of our state, and think he could fix the problem in America, but he's not as popular has Hillary, and Obama. If Hillary is president I would have faith in her. People want to see a black president, and they want to see a woman president, but I say, lets get bush out of there ASAP. He has done NO GOOD for America. I can say these things, b/c I didnt vote for him either time he was elected.
2007-06-30 05:30:15 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs. 26 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure if you want the USA to be a communist Gulag, vote for Hillary. She'll ration your healthcare, your gas and your money as long as you send 80% of it to the government in taxes, and call it a "contribution."
It was more like bush solved the problems that Clinton created. Like letting al-queda get strong enough to do 9-11.
2007-06-30 10:43:22 · answer #3 · answered by stick man 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No bush! No Clinton! Vote for someone that will secure our border first, support our border patrol, uphold our constitution and laws, take our troops out of this civil war, cleanse the country of drugs and gangs.
2007-06-30 05:18:41 · answer #4 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More than half of Americans won't vote for Clinton, poll shows
Survey provides a snapshot of the senator's challenges as she seeks the Democratic nomination for president
By William Douglas
MCCLATCHY WASHINGTON BUREAU
Contra Costa Times
Article Launched:
WASHINGTON -- More than half of Americans say they wouldn't consider voting for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton for president if she becomes the Democratic nominee, according to a new national poll made available to McClatchy Newspapers and NBC News.
2007-06-30 04:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
bush is the oen who decided to be president . he dosnt need another president to help him make decisions. when bush was running, he knew what he was getting into. there is no need for clinton to baby bush and solve his problems for him. thank fully when elections are back bush cant run. cause the longest you can last is 2 terms.
2007-06-30 13:33:43 · answer #6 · answered by mlaguna_1994 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you check the economy was already improving when Clinton came into office, that is one of the myths they tried to exploit which shows it works because you have no data to show where the economy was failing. Crime rate was already on the down slide some of it from the Reagan administration's stance against drugs. So please go back and read a non-partisan regular history book to get your facts straight.
2007-06-30 04:17:21 · answer #7 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not unless Clinton votes for Bush Again !
2007-06-30 05:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by bermudakeyman 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think the best thing Bush has accomplished in the White House is ensure a Democrat in office in 08.
2007-06-30 04:16:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The best thing that nominating Hillary is going to do is guarentee atleast another four years with a republican as president.
Nominate Hillary, Vote Giuliani.
2007-06-30 04:26:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋