nope it would never work unless you are prepared to do what we did in Iraq which is go in oust there leader hang him bomb the crap out of their people and then call it operation Mexican freedom
2007-06-30 00:39:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by plhudson01 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you want to eliminate drugs and illegal immigrants coming from Mexico, you can put more border agents and/or troops on the border. It is not necessary to invade Mexico.
Increasing border security might be a good idea, but it can be done in addition to the war in the Middle East. There's no need to choose.
And I don't think the Middle East is a lost cause.
2007-06-30 07:41:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your ideas seem good to me. We need to get our troops home, alive as soon as possible. Why are we in a country(ies) that do not understand democracy and frankly, don't want one and don't want us there?
If we sent our troops to Mexico, would they be allowed to do the job of wiping out the drug trade, and the corruption in their government? Probably not - for it would unbalance our trade ties with our southern ally! But it is a great idea!
2007-06-30 08:51:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That definitely won't happen, but I think the troops should conduct maneuvers the entire length of the borders, armed with a lot of live ammo and authority to keep out illegal aliens, would-be terrorists and drug runners. There would have to be a written promise that they won't be court martialed for doing it.
That would kill two birds with one stone, so to speak.
2007-07-01 16:12:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eyes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is what I call universal thinking. Good of you to think this way. In fact, if your suggestion is carried out by the politicians, then they can save themselves and the world a lot of agony.
The problem with the US govenmrnt is that they think only one way, and see things fro m a very narrow minded position.
Yes, if they can dedicate a small portion of the war budget, they can do wonders and come out as leaders of the world.
2007-06-30 09:05:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by omarkati 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your idea is not as bad as some would think. I do think we need to finish what was started in the Middle East. Insurgent groups do need to stopped or it will be worse later. I do agree that the "insurgents" from south of the boarder need stopped also.
2007-06-30 07:44:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by doctdon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm in your camp ! We are definately being invaded, and then told how we need them, by them. Politicians say that we can't round them up, and send them all back, my question is "WHY NOT", how many people does a 747 hold ? over 400 ?, and just how many 747's does the U.S. have ? about 1000 ?
We can can clean up all of the "Vermin" in just two weeks ! They entered the country illegally, they are criminals, write your congressman and tell him he should worry about the American Vote, NOT the spanish vote, we'll put their azz OUT OF OFFICE by OUR VOTE !
2007-06-30 07:45:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And you want to wipe out the drug trade?! Damn! You must be smokin' some good stuff. I'm just jealous because I have none.
2007-06-30 08:44:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by James S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money trumps everything. The President said so.
2007-06-30 07:35:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anthony S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You got a good idea and it would stop a lot of killing
2007-06-30 07:40:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by lonetraveler 5
·
0⤊
0⤋