whoever dunnit, left their cars in very obvious and illegal places. Wouldn't you think thatthey would have left them as unobstrusive as poss? Does this theory mean I have terrorist tendencies[I haven't honestly]
2007-06-30 00:28:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
MMM food for thought. Perhaps the fear of explosions and casualties is what the terrorists wanted?
2007-06-30 00:34:09 · answer #1 · answered by Mumofthree 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps they wanted the satisfaction of blowing up a police officer before anyone else. They also wanted to produce the maximum effect, which means putting them where the crowds are. A bombed car in a quiet back street might only destroy property. They were after people.
2007-06-30 08:59:23 · answer #2 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unobtrusive probably wouldn't have caused the casualties that the terrorists were looking for.
Knowing the laxity of police, they probably figured it'd be hours before they got around to investigating the illegally parked cars.
2007-06-30 07:32:43 · answer #3 · answered by BDZot 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Weird isn't it, both didn't go off, and now we're all on high alert and not paying too much attention to George Brown taking over...sort of putting attention on something that didn't happen, while we have to be grateful we have a strong PM and Home Secretary in charge now.....conspiracy or what?
2007-06-30 07:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by terryellislondon 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It might be strange to you unless you consider that it was a suicide bomb that failed to go off. When it didn't devastate the nightclub the bomber ran away,
2007-06-30 07:33:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
maybe its another false flag operation to justify even more harsh and repressive measures against the people
2007-06-30 11:28:23 · answer #6 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u guys need to beef up seurity reallly just a little somethin to help make it happen
2007-06-30 08:18:46 · answer #7 · answered by randynogood-* 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This was a threat of terror. It was not an act of terror. Spot the difference?
2007-06-30 07:36:58 · answer #8 · answered by bluebadger 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It means terrorists are incredibly stupid as well as very bad.
2007-06-30 07:33:30 · answer #9 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well they would have known they would be touched and maybe that was what was supposed to set them off? i dont know..... am just thankful they didnt go off.
2007-06-30 07:38:17 · answer #10 · answered by i give up 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋