English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

I do not like or trust clown Brown but credit where it is due.
New labour is so short of real talent that is has to go outside the government to choose those likely to have their heads screwed on the right way to be reasonably sure of getting good as opposed to politically slanted advice.
I think it is a wise and courageous move just so long as he holds himself responsible for the decisions when things go wrong, as they will and do in all governments

2007-06-30 07:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0 0

Don't know but a woman holds the Home Secretary position for the first time so he can't be all bad. Go Jacgui Smith go! Only time will tell if his reshuffle was wise or not, I just hope all those that changed sides are genuine in their political beliefs now! I like the name of the guy in charge of our schools; ED BALLS (wonder if he was 'ed boy? LOL) because, let's be fair, you need some large ones to tackle the state of our education system at the mo..

2007-06-29 23:21:36 · answer #2 · answered by mrsB 2 · 0 0

Because he believes those individuals are best suited to the job he has offered them and they have agreed to accept the Labour Whip irrespective of their own political views.

If only all senior Government posts went to people who could actually do a good job!

2007-06-29 23:02:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because a change is as good as a rest and he realises that we all need a rest from Tony's cronies. Come to think of it, we need a rest from most of Labour altogether. Trouble is, is there any party that could successfully take over.

2007-06-30 02:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because he wants pass a new resolution with the new political parties and with the young generations and make a changes in his country to develop the organizations to do better for his country

2007-06-29 23:15:34 · answer #5 · answered by murtuza k 2 · 0 0

It's either a cunning ruse to convince us he really means to change things without really doing anything to upset the status quo OR he actually is going to listen to people who really know what they're on about and have experience in the REAL world.

God, I hope it's the latter.

2007-06-29 23:15:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because he is desperate to convince us all that he is making changes and enlisting the help of every Tom Dick and Harry whether they are any good or not.At the end of the day it is the same old party with the same old backdoor taxation policies.Tax Tax Tax, fritter fritter fritter.

2007-06-29 23:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by little weed 6 · 1 0

Maybe you should offer your line-up and let the public vote on what they think, it is easy to score points on the back of others, please do a line up and then see what others think of your choices, you'll soon see that you really can't please everyone, criticism is so easy to give, maybe people should come up with constructive ideas and then the stages of making them happen. Reality is a lot different then sat typing a keyboard .....

2007-06-29 23:12:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he might be a bush loving oil company dupe like tb

2007-06-29 23:09:37 · answer #9 · answered by bdbbdb 3 · 0 0

Women in black suits

2007-06-30 09:35:04 · answer #10 · answered by puffcandy007 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers