English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Yes I would. We can leave now with 3,576 dead "OR" leave in 10 years with 50,000 dead. No matter what we will lose the war in Iraq.

2007-06-29 21:14:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Yes. I would do it intelligently, and ensure there are safeguards in place, before leaving. Move the troops to a "safe zone" (if there actually is one), and allow the Iraqi's to defend their own country. Also, with appropriate support and continued training from our military leaders, and, air support where possible. There obviously is more involved than this - but, it's a start.

2007-06-30 05:41:52 · answer #2 · answered by Ro40rd 3 · 1 0

The proper winning strategy is to retreat to bases in Iraq and whenever the enemy gathers in strength enough to overthrow the government, hit them with missiles. We have low casualties and gives the Iraqis time to solve their problems. Low cost also.

2007-06-30 04:30:18 · answer #3 · answered by Richard F 7 · 1 0

Yep. Things can't be much worse for the Iraqis if we leave. But we could take the money (a billion dollars a week) and do a lot of good with it. Not to mention our folks who are being killed and maimed there.
The longer we stay the worse the rest of the world is thinking we are. We are like a giant dictatorship picking on some small country. The best way to combat terrorism is to have good relations with people around the world.
Let's come home yesterday!

2007-06-30 04:17:04 · answer #4 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 3 2

yes, but only to some extent. If the factions at war ( sunnis, shiites, etc) have reached a level of compromise that gives you a reasonable doubt that there wont be massive vindictive genocide, then i think you may be able to reduce the amount of troops.

We cant just leave the destruction and chaos that the war has caused. We have to fix it. First, the people that are fighting each other have to resolve their problems. I dont think the US can leave unless we achieve that somehow.

2007-06-30 04:16:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

yes and id send them to africa theres many more innocent lives to save there

and i say good day sir

an i the only one who can see a little bit of nixon in bush
afraid doesnt want to leave the war scared about being one of the few presidents to lose a war HUH anyone

2007-06-30 04:28:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This habit of building US bases in different parts of the world has to stop.

You know, it is against international law for foriegn troops to be stationed in a soveriegn country.

Whatever international law is.

2007-06-30 04:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1 1

Yes, its too late for putting more troops in. Now it is all up to the Iraqis to make it work.

2007-06-30 04:19:31 · answer #8 · answered by Roy 4 · 1 2

from Iraq, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Japan.....all of them...the usa has its military stationed in over 150 countries....something England could have only dreamed of during the height of its imperialism. Stop spending more than the rest of the world combined on your military....get your miitary out of other people's countries....all of them...NOW!!!!

2007-06-30 04:18:51 · answer #9 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 2 2

I don't know. I would have to look at the intelligence, talk to my military advisers, and figure out why the heck we were there in the first place.

2007-06-30 04:16:17 · answer #10 · answered by tom w 4 · 3 1

No the reasons are outlined here - http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-lc2Cu843erIwY6fujsZpxHBX?tag=iraq

2007-06-30 04:17:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers