English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-29 17:47:36 · 11 answers · asked by Jay H 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

11 answers

Yes, it was all a part of the Illuminati's plan. Bush and Clinton were both in on it.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/wtc/index02.htm

2007-06-29 17:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I suppose that depends on what you mean by an inside job. I do not personally believe at all that the Bush adminstration had any hand in either the planning or the execution of the plan. I believe that to be entirely an Al-qaeda deal.

What I do believe is that the Bush adminstration knew of the attack beforehand and chose to ALLOW it to happen. Not that they authorized it or helped in its execution, but rather that they withheld information from those who may have been able to stop it.

I believe they did this so that they could do precisely what they did afterwards. They used the event to clamp down on many of our freedoms, with the excuse they were trying to protect our lives. And anytime anyone tried to step in their way, they were attacked as unpatriotic at best and terrorism supporters at worst. This also silenced nearly all criticism of the war beforehand; and made anyone who decided to speak out anyway seem cowardly or completely crazy. Basically how the adminstration handled this situation gave them power never before seen in the presidency (which looked remarkably like an attempt at dictatorship, and in fact still very much does).

As far as the explosives at the bottom of the towers idea, I doubt that is what happened. I did see the explosion outward at the bottom of the towers right before they fell; but I think what happened instead was that the inside of the two buildings collapsed first. The inside materials hit the ground on the inside of the buildings first; but since the buildings were designed to take a lot the outside of both buildings were able to stand for a few seconds longer before caving in because they no longer had interior support. I believe this is why everyone saw the first floor "explosions" before the fall of the buildings.

2007-06-30 01:22:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes, Inside a plane, inside a religion (Islam).

The conspiracy of our government? Inside your head.

Amazing that people will continue to do this 911 conspiracy nonsense, but can't understand that if the President or anyone could do that, they couldn't also plant a few WMDs in the deserts of Iraq to save face.

Silly.

2007-06-30 00:53:46 · answer #3 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1 3

No, it was definately not an inside job and anyone who says that it was just wants to find some peculiarity out of it. The only reason that people think that it could've been an inside job is so that there would be an excuse to put up cameras around the U.S. But, it's stupid to think that the U.S. would willingly kill thousands just to do that.

2007-06-30 01:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by Tom Davis 1 · 1 3

Yes. Inside Al-Queda.

Why would you even ask this? If you can't figure this out for yourself you're an idiot. If you asked purely to be rhetoricle and provoke people....you're still an idiot because you didn't even include a political statement in your question.

I don't mean to come accross as picking on you. This is just a stupid question. If you honestly have trouble figuring these things out do feel free to email me at anytime. I'll help you out.

2007-06-30 00:53:16 · answer #5 · answered by thekingbeav 3 · 1 3

Yup, a plane flew into the bldg, exploded and down it came.
Now lets build the wall and quit wasting time on BS.

2007-06-30 00:56:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

452, 224, 452,225, 452, 226 (that would be NO, NO, NO)

2007-06-30 00:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by hardwoodrods 6 · 1 2

For the 453,224th time, NO!

2007-06-30 00:57:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

For the 453,222nd time, no.

2007-06-30 00:50:52 · answer #9 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 0 2

Hmmmm, liberal?

2007-06-30 01:15:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers