Science hasn't proven how the universe was created or that it even had a moment of creation.
Science has only demonstrated that what we observe today is consistent with a universe that was once (about 14 billion years ago) much much much smaller and hotter than it is now.
Anything beyond that (such as speculating that some intelligent entity was responsible for it all) is unfounded.
2007-06-29 15:10:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no need to consider what happened "before" the Big Bang, nor to consider what is "outside" the Universe. That's because space-time is a property of the universe and it has no meaning beyond the universe.
2007-06-29 22:59:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by poorcocoboiboi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Always remember science does not prove anything. It only disproves thing by testing and falsification. Science hasn't proven the big bang. Its just the most popular working model we have right now.
2007-06-29 22:14:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady Geologist 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nobody, science agrees that the theory of the big bang has merit because of the observable manifestations of the probably of it being correct.
2007-07-02 13:05:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by johnandeileen2000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This universe and the material in this universe was never really gone, matter moves inward and outward, perpetually. The Big Expansion has no sound and is controlled by The First Energy source.
2007-06-29 22:48:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by spir_i_tual 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
one theory is that the previous universe (like the current one) had a number of black holes. Gradullay these swallowed up all matter and then each other. eventaully all that was left what a tiny piece of matter of infinite mass. this then exploded outwqards to form the new universe - our one. In our one the black holes are slowly repeating the same process.
2007-06-29 22:12:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Since I can find no evidence that matter can create life, then I guess life must create matter.
My guess is SOME form of life created the universe and since we are alive, we probably had something to do with it.
Take a bow. Keep up the good work!
2007-06-29 22:32:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
No, that's a site people keep posting ridiculous spam from. Like you, apparently. Look up M-theory and brane theory if you actually want an answer - although I doubt it.
2007-06-29 22:11:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by eri 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
not known,perhaps the big bang has antithesis in big collapse and the process is cyclical and unending,,,perhaps there are other universes with different or similar rules,,,who runs it all,,idk
2007-07-01 01:58:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by quackpotwatcher 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,.... science has not proved our beginning. But your question is one that is ignored when science talks about our beginning.
2007-06-29 22:49:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by orion_1812@yahoo.com 6
·
1⤊
1⤋