2007-06-29 14:32:03 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
sure - no sun for me!
2007-06-29 14:34:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It used to be VERY popular for a woman to be pale... plus, being pale is much healthier.
Maybe I'm just wishing. I'm too pale to ever be tan, ha ha....
2007-06-29 21:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by Celeste H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
haha i think i look wayyyy better with a tan but pale is cute too
2007-06-30 14:55:01 · answer #3 · answered by Kelsey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, YES!! There's too much risk of skin damage - melanoma, tough wrinkled skin, etc. Not worth all the trouble if you spend as much time as you need to slathering Sun Screen on yourself. Does anyone ever look at a photo of a melanoma, or know how quickly they can kill you?
2007-06-29 21:39:04 · answer #4 · answered by Julia D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes it would be so much easier for my pale white skin.
but unfortunately not a beautiful unless perfect.
2007-06-29 21:35:04 · answer #5 · answered by phoebe r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Why anyone would ever think leathery skin is hot boggles the mind.
2007-06-29 21:34:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.....fish belly white is the new pale.
2007-06-29 21:34:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
pale is not tan, that doesnt make sense to me!
that statement is confizzled.
2007-06-29 21:35:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think so, I'm pale.
2007-06-29 21:34:17 · answer #9 · answered by lilith 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes...peaches and cream complexion gets my vote over tanned, precancerous skin any day.....:)
2007-06-29 21:35:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a red head. So yes i think it should.
2007-06-29 21:35:16 · answer #11 · answered by Ladybug1223 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋