Do liberals only show up in churches on campaign trails?

Answer 1

No, they show up to churches if and when they want to, like everyone else.

Answer 2

Liberals are absolutely shameless when it comes to getting votes. Hillary, when in front of a black audience, puts on this ridiculous southern accent, which I imagine her handlers have determined makes Hillary more palatable to black voters.

A Liberal will act devout and attend a church for a photo op, and immediately after wards refer to that place as one of the "fly over" states.

It's hilarious that Liberals will mock the Conservative who trots out the wife and kids for a photo op at a church, when in fact he goes every Sunday. The Conservative will be mocked for a belief in God. But come election season, the Libs suddenly find God, and they can be seen in their Sunday best, pumping hands and kissing babies. It's appalling.

Answer 3

Yep... every 2 years... soon y'all be seeing the Democrats flocking to black churches to preach against the Demonic Rascally Republicans.... get the votes... then post election forget all about the voters until the next cycle

Answer 4

Yes. Exactly like conservatives.

Answer 5

I don't know... do they?

I've never seen Bush going to church... either... but he may...

it's something I never hear about either way?

got any sources or are you just assuming?

I thought Obama was part of that "evil left wing church that he often attends"? now he doesn't go?

Answer 6

No. Bill Clinton was pretty good about regular church attendance while in office, but was sure to do so in front of the media and with an over-sized, novelty Bible.

Answer 7

I have observed this oddity. And wondered how quickly my church would lose its 501(c)3 status if Bush came and spoke there.

Answer 8

They like to fool the American public that they're on their side. Inside every liberals' head is an islamic terrorist. The only thing is they're not in proximity and too cowardly to be one.

Answer 9

Using the phrase "creating human-animal hybrids" pushes the required buttons. It produces an intended frenzy among the religious Right. It deliberately sensationalizes and trivializes the complex issues at hand. Complexity and explanation of it, however, are not what the ignorant seek. Those manipulating the ignorant prefer to provide neither. The ignorant are comfortable with simple solutions offered them. They are content to living their lives with minimal personal involvement in the quest for knowledge. They are happy to accept what they are told - and to blame those who do not accept it - for the world's ills. Out of fear, the simple-minded accept whatever new doctrine or enemy their pastor or their president declares. With God and Karl Rove calling the shots, redemption is just around the corner. To them there is no need to question Mr. Bush who is obviously an authority on nothing? There is no desire to hammer this non-reading president for his ridiculous reference to human-animal hybrids? Does George W. Bush, for example, believe that a pig heart-valve replacement, if it were needed to save his life, would make him a "human-animal hybrid"? Does George W. Bush actually know what "an egregious abuse of medical research" is? I doubt it.

What George W. Bush was doing, in this the Dark Age year of 2006 State of the Union speech, where his approval poll numbers are in the cellar, was to reach out and touch the religious ignoramus base. Bush is attempting to throw out the "mad-scientists" and their Liberal lackeys for his own political expediency. These same "mad-scientists", however, are the ones required to perform for the Empire in its quest for world domination and global hegemony. The hypocrisy abounds as Bush relies upon science and the scientific community for the creation of the Pentagon's new generation of weapons of mass destruction. Current weapons of mass destruction include internationally banned cluster bombs, depleted uranium, tactical nuclear warheads, napalm, white phosphorous, bunker busters, etc. Here is a man who criticizes science research, for example the stem cell research with the potential to saves lives, while embracing and admiring the shock and awe that destroys it. Where are your priorities, Mr. Bush?

When you tell the people you have God on your side, they will, in this New Dark Age, believe anything you say. George W. Bush's appeal to the public's aversion toward scientific research is an attempt to divert the ever-growing national and international disgust that free-thinking people have of him. Unfortunately, the number of free-thinkers in this time of disknowledge is alarming. Why is it acceptable for the United States to traumatize human embryos and create deformed babies by spreading depleted uranium across the country-side of an illegally occupied country? Why is it acceptable to bomb pregnant women and forcefully abort their fetuses from 50,000 feet? Why is it an honorable thing to brag about fighting a war by remote control from the comfort of your living room, as Dick Cheney has done? Why is it unacceptable to create a hybrid species of laboratory mice that could be used to cure human disease and alleviate debilitating human conditions, but acceptable to drop thousands of pounds of bombs on the Iraqi people? Why are genetically altered animals acceptable to be eaten by humans as food but not to cure diseases? Why is the "Flavor Savor™" tomato acceptable for sale in our super-markets? Including the "Flavor Savor™", there are presently 50 genetically altered plant varieties approved by the USDA (Biotech at SFA). Why do Bush's friends in the beef industry force feed rendered fowl, poultry, lamb and cattle to cows? If ever there was a disgusting practice, it is force feeding rendered animal by-products to ruminants.

Answer 10

Do conservatives have exclusive rights for attending church services?