English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Sadly this question and all others about experiences at the speed of light do not have a definitive answer. You cannot go at the speed of light so the question is hypothetical. Hypothetical questions do not have definitive answers. Only massless particles such as photons can go at the speed of light. As a massive object approaches the speed of light the amount of energy needed to accelerate it further increases so that an infinite amount would be needed to reach the speed of light.

Sometimes people persist: What would the world look like in the reference frame of a photon? What does a photon experience? Does space contract to two dimensions at the speed of light? Does time stop for a photon?. . . It is really not possible to make sense of such questions and any attempt to do so is bound to lead to paradoxes. There are no inertial reference frames in which the photon is at rest so it is hopeless to try to imagine what it would be like in one. Photons do not have experiences. There is no sense in saying that time stops when you go at the speed of light. This is not a failing of the theory of relativity. There are no inconsistencies revealed by these questions. They just don't make sense.

Despite these empty answers, nobody should feel too put down for asking such questions. They are exactly the kind of question that Einstein often asked himself from the age of 16 until he discovered special relativity ten years later. Einstein reported that in 1896 he thought,

``If I pursue a beam of light with the velocity c (velocity of light in a vacuum), I should observe such a beam of light as a spatially oscillatory electromagnetic field at rest. However, there seems to be no such thing, whether on the basis of experience or according to Maxwell's equations. From the very beginning it appeared to me intuitively clear that, judged from the standpoint of such an observer, everything would have to happen according to the same laws as for an observer who, relative to the earth, was at rest. For how, otherwise, should the first observer know, i.e., be able to determine, that he is in a state of fast uniform motion? One sees that in this paradox the germ of the special relativity theory is already contained. Today everyone knows, of course, that all attempts to clarify this paradox satisfactorily were condemned to failure as long as the axiom of the absolute character of time, viz., of a simultaneous, unrecognizedly was anchored in the unconscious. Clearly to recognize this axiom and its arbitrary character really implies already the solution to the problem.''

In 1905 he realised how it could be that light always goes at the same speed no matter how fast you go. Events that are simultaneous in one reference frame will happen at different times in another that has a velocity relative to the first. Space and time cannot be taken as absolute. On this basis Einstein constructed the theory of special relativity, which has since been well confirmed by experiment.

Questions of relative velocity in relativity can be answered using the velocity subtraction formula v = (w - u)/(1 - wu/c2) (see relativity FAQ: velocity addition). If you are driving at a speed u relative to me and you measure the speed of light in the same direction (w = c in my frame), the formula gives v the speed of light in your reference frame as, v = (c-u)/(1 - u/c). For any speed u less than c this gives v = c so the speed of light is the same for you. But if u = c the formula degenerates to zero divided by zero; a meaningless answer.

If you want to know what happens when you are driving at very nearly the speed of light, an answer can be given. Within your car you observe no unusual effects. You can look at yourself in your mirror which is moving with the car and you will look the same as usual. Looking out of the window is a different matter. The light from your headlights will always go at the speed of light in your reference frame. It will strike any object in its path and be reflected back. Everything else will be coming towards you at nearly the speed of light, so the light reflected from it will be Doppler shifted to very high frequencies--towards the ultraviolet or beyond. If you have a suitable camera you could take a snapshot. The objects passing are contracted in length but because of the different times of passage for the light and effects of aberration, the snapshot will show the objects you pass as rotated.

2007-07-03 06:30:50 · answer #1 · answered by Abhinesh 4 · 1 0

In your referential, things would look normal, the headlight would emit photons travelling at 300000 km per sec away from you, because time would have slowed down so that the speed of light relatively to you stays the same !
This is why there is a time dilation when you go very fast, you need the speed of light to be the same for anyone.

Now what would look strange is the landscape around you... Have you ever thought of that?

2007-06-29 10:52:11 · answer #2 · answered by Kilohn 3 · 1 0

If you switched on the headlights there would be a glow around you but in would not shine out in front of you. If you switch on the interior lights it would still light up the car.

2007-06-29 10:53:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If you have mass, you can't travel at light speed. But what if you were massless (like a photon) and turned on the lights (somehow created some more photons to go with you)? The newly created photons would just travel alongside you. When you are massless (and traveling at light speed), velocity doesn't really have any meaning anyway, since lengths contract to zero and times dilate out to infinity.

2007-06-29 10:51:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I heard that if you're driving at the speed of light and you turn on your headlights, the ghost of Albert Einstein appears and says "Stop bugging me with questions I've already answered!"

2007-06-29 10:55:01 · answer #5 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 1 1

the speed of light (from the headlights) would be twice the speed of light relative to something stationary.

2007-06-29 16:20:12 · answer #6 · answered by DuckyWucky 3 · 0 0

I assume you mean the headlights. They would not light up in front of you like your normal car headlights, rather they would travel at the same speed and someone looking at the front of your car (or ship) would see them on.

2007-06-29 11:00:14 · answer #7 · answered by Frank 2 · 0 1

from your shuttle or space ship the light beam will look fixed length line traveling as part of your shuttle. From outside observer, would look a normal traveling space ship turning its light on.

2007-06-29 11:02:35 · answer #8 · answered by carspare 2 · 0 1

in reference to the statement that photons are massless, remember e=mc squared.

2007-06-29 14:08:41 · answer #9 · answered by ftm821 2 · 0 1

I'm so sick of people asking that question every single day. I know the answer but I'm not going to tell you!

2007-06-29 10:51:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers