English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

U.S. casualties have been rising since President Bush ordered nearly 30,000 more troops to Iraq in a major push to pacify Baghdad and surrounding areas. The goal was to curb the violence so Iraq's Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish leaders can strike agreements to share power in this fractious country.

But progress toward agreements to share oil wealth, provide a greater political role to the Sunni minority and shore up local governments has been slow because of deep suspicions after four years of bloodshed.

btw I am not blaming our soldiers as you can't win a civil war for another country.

2007-06-29 09:48:20 · 7 answers · asked by bbbbriggs04 3 in Politics & Government Politics

I gave the troops props for fighting even know the mission is unwinnalbe. what more do you want. You can't fault the troops just the leaders. I pray long and hard that we will be succesful in completing the task of holding the person responsible for 9/11 (bin ladin to the lay conservative), to justice

2007-06-29 09:55:04 · update #1

cause con denotates the conning aspect of conservative mental midgets.

2007-06-29 09:56:34 · update #2

7 answers

i cant seem to find this failure you dreamers keep speaking of why dont you just give up on trying to demoralize the american troops and crawl back under your rock

2007-06-29 09:52:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You can, in fact, win a civil war for another country. It's been done innumerable times throughout history - in fact, it's really just a variation on the time-honored 'divide an conquer.' Though, to be more presice, you can use a civil conflict to conquer another country. America's historical and current distaste for conquest, though, has led to an undeclared war of half measures in Iraq. The republican leadership lacks the will to win the war, and the democratic leadership is committed to losing it.

2007-06-29 16:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 0

The majority of us cons no longer support Bush in the war which he illegally started by supplying false documentation regarding WMD's. This is one reason Bush is failing miserably. Even us Republicans have lost confidence in this man. He is the worst President this Nation has ever seen. He may have to exile himself in a foreign land after his term, maybe Iraq.

2007-06-29 16:54:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hey, I would love to get rid of our failures in Iraq. But unfortunately, Democrats are allowed to visit Iraq just like the Republicans.

2007-06-29 16:57:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I support winning in Iraq. The failure strategies are coming from the left.

2007-06-29 16:54:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If we leave now, we are complicit in creating a terrorist state that will not rest until we are destroyed, so therefore we must not leave.

AND WHY IS EVERYONE ON YAHOO ANSWERS TO DAMN LAZY TO TYPE "CONSERVATIVES" AS OPPOSED TO "CONS!!!"

2007-06-29 16:55:05 · answer #6 · answered by Collin D 2 · 0 0

Its a war give me a brake, men die in war, but it should be fought like a war also...

2007-06-29 16:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers