yesterday and stated something like " if it was white women between 25 - 35 there would be an uproar" while talking to the black voters. Now , as I see it , that is pandering for the black vote.She is also insulting the white women voters. So, she is already showing just how 2 faced she really is. Would any white women between 25 - 35 vote for her now?
2007-06-29 08:18:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
On Yahoo news yesterday.
2007-06-29 08:22:54 · update #1
Slapnut, what is wrong with the Confederate Flag? I am assuming you mean the Confederate Battle Flag? If you associate that flag as a sign of Racism or Slavery you need to do some research on the Civil War. The Civil War was more than a slavery Issue. And not every white person in the South owned slaves. The Flag is just a symbol of Southern Pride, that's all. Get over it already after 150 years.
2007-06-29 18:16:20 · update #2
Shes a chameleon, she will say what it takes. Her statement would be more convincing if HIV/AIDS wasn't a preventable disease. If she were talking about Cancer that was infecting primarily black woman then I would understand the bias. but shes talking about a preventable disease, HIV/AIDS doesn't only infect black woman.
2007-06-29 08:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by another brick in the wall 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No way in hel! would I vote for Hillary. Everything out of her mouth is wrong. She must think everyone is stupid.
All she is doing is trying for the black vote and will do and say anything to get it. Mabe she is two faced..... but I think she would be the worst thing ever to happen to this country if she became president
2007-06-29 21:03:08 · answer #2 · answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No way. She is slapping Women in the face. She has to demonize a group of people in order to get some votes?
2007-06-29 18:13:40 · answer #3 · answered by Don't Know 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that woman can't separate logic from emotion. So, unfortunately, most liberal women will vote for her...not because she is the logical choice, but because they are emotionally drawn to the idea of a woman president.
-RIGHTWING65..
I concurr!
2007-06-29 16:32:07 · answer #4 · answered by 2008 matters 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm 37 and wasn't going to vote for Rottenham Clinton even BEFORE she decided to insult half the people in the country.
2007-06-29 15:22:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
Hecks sakes alive, Bill didn't even think she could give a decent bj.
2007-06-29 17:33:59 · answer #6 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that woman can't separate logic from emotion. So, unfortunately, most liberal women will vote for her...not because she is the logical choice, but because they are emotionally drawn to the idea of a woman president.
2007-06-29 15:22:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Not if they have functioning brains, but then nobody of any race, age or gender with a functioning brain will vote for Hildabeast.
2007-06-29 15:22:53 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
You are really delusional if you don't think all candidates pander to their audience. Guliani said the confederate flag was fine when he was in SC...Hillary said it was a disgrace...which one do you think was being truthful?
2007-06-29 15:27:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I did twice for senator. Your quote and context is a little strange, could you please source it so I can understand where you are coming from a bit better?
Do the work and actually find the source.
2007-06-29 15:21:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋