Do you think divorce courts are biased towards women in child custody battles?

Question

Biology doesn't make you a better parent. Men are not just sperm-providers who pay the bills even when a woman leaves. I am not against the fair splitting of assets, but a man should not be milked for child support and denied access and possible custody. That is unfair. There is no reason to think that women are better parents. That is an idea out of man-hating, marriage-hating matriarchal radical feminism. Feminism used to be about equality.

Answer 1

Yes, they are biased. They claim they look out for the "Childs best interest" Thats BULLSHlT. The mother always gets the child unless she's proven to be "unfit" Even if she is unfit (eg smokes crack), they'll still award her custody as long as she promises to attend rehab. The woman, however, does not need to prove the man to be "unfit" in order to get custody... so unfair.

Answer 2

perchance the divorce/custody courts are biased in direction of females contained in relation to youngsters, even in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, females nevertheless do almost all of childcare in the time of this u . s . a ., so it is not often outstanding. whilst the day comes that each physique adult men are somewhat taking an entire 50% of the prevalent jobs of youngster-rearing, according to probability that variety could additionally out. And no, feminism isn't the basis. interior the uncommon situations of divorce that handed off interior the 50s and early 60s, there replaced into on no account a query that the youngsters would not pass to the mummy solely. those days, shared custody is extra the norm than the exception.

Answer 3

Yes, historically women have been the primary care givers especially for small children and the courts have followed with that reasoning. That being said, I think the times are changing for men. I have noticed that there are more states that are balanced with their judgments both with financial obligations and custody. There are still some areas of the county that fall behind (SC for one). I think the courts are starting to see that children benefit from having considerable contact with both parents. Yeah for the kids!

Answer 4

We live in a misogynist society. there is the rule that women are the care givers, and dad's only provide money. mom was at home, cleaning and changing diapers, whie dad had a life, and a place in society.
so in the case of divorce the law still acts out this sexist notion. give the kids to mom, and dad has to continue being the financial provider. all that money doesn't translate into " he get the kids because i spent so much money on them"
mostly, they don't argue if a dad can care for his kids, instead inforce the rule that he shouldn't.

it is the misogyny some guys put out there coming back to get you in the end.

Answer 5

Yes but.... The system is defiantly moving toward joint physical custody. They are finally figuring out that both parents participating regularly is best for children.

Answer 6

yes but the realanswer goes back to the beginning of time. The vast majority of people were raised by their mother while dad supported the family and thus the courts award custody more to mothers barring any unfit reason because they are better at raising kids than dad.Not that dads do a bad job,its more naturlistic for mothers

Answer 7

I must live in the only town in the USA where people are still living like cavemen. Men that beat their wives, scare people to get what they want, can't do anything to take care of their selves or a child and get joint custody.

Answer 8

Yes.. I thought that was pretty well known. Alot of courts tend to lean towards mothers since they actually gave birth to the kid. I think its harder for a mother to walk away than a father to walk away. I know it happens though because my "mother in law" walked out on my husband and his sisters 30 years ago.

Answer 9

Geez it must be woman bashing day. Grow up, calm down before you have a fit.