The pentagon had only one outside camera.
The wtc7 fell down because a piece of the tower hit it.
The went to Iraq looking for Bin Laden.
The government said they have not trained for that kind of attack, even thought later on it was found out they were training some days before for that kind of attack.
Do you believe the "official" report?
2007-06-29 05:47:39 · 20 answers · asked by geeks_gadgets 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, because it says it wasn't an inside job.
2007-06-29 06:38:26 · answer #1 · answered by Peace-seeker 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
some parts yes some parts no. The recent NIST analysis of the towers falling was great but they brought up a good point. The fiberglass nose and metal skin of the fuselage was torn to bits upon impact while the large spinning titanium engine shafts ripped through the building. Since the same type of aircraft struck the pentagon how was it that the soft body of the plane was able to punch a hole in the brick walls while the engine shafts did no damage. take a look at the available photos.
2007-06-29 12:57:27 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No I don't believe the official conspiracy theory.
I will give you a link to a question I asked, the best answer there is equally the best answer here. Pleases look at the facts to see that the official theory is hog wash.
I might add that you forgot to mention witch one of the conflicting official stories you were referring to.
2007-06-29 23:18:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think they'll hate you. Once they have made up their mind, facts are but a mere annoyance. A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking, the official report is a conclusion.
2007-06-29 13:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by Jose R 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Watch loose change the documentary. You can find it at google videos. It explains alot of things that DONT coincide with the official report. Bryan obviously doesn't know what he's talking about.
2007-06-29 12:54:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Not for one second.
You only have to look at the hole in the Pentagon to know a passenger liner did not hit that building.
2007-06-29 16:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by t_rex_is_mad 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Depends on what "official" report you are talking about? Are you talking about the report that says Bin Laden was responsible for it the unofficial official report that says how it was really an alien attack?
2007-06-29 12:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by TIME's Person of the Year 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
does ot matter now? when the government wants to get involved in a war, they will find a way! look at ww11- the people in washington knew!! the japs were going to attack pearl harbor, yet did nothing to stop it! why? the UNITED STATES WAS ITCHING TO GET INVOLVED!! same thing with the twin towers? could well be!! it is sad that this government would sacrifice their own people to get involved in foreign affairs to further our own agenda!!
2007-06-29 12:52:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Yes because it says what actually happened. And no obviously you haven't read it because it say WTC7 collapsed from a fire that was ignored because of the rescue effort at the towers.
We went to Iraq for Saddam and WMDs not for Bin Laden. Bin Laden is in Pakistan.
The Pentagon only released one of their camera's footage, why would they need more?
The government did recieve inteligence that terrorist might use planes, maybe even crash them into buildings. Is there anyway that anyone in the world could have prevented it? NO, no one actually expected these jihadist that think killing non-muslims and committing suicide gets you to heaven. You know because it must say that in the Koran.
2007-06-29 12:53:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 9⤋
i don't believe half of what you said is even accurate...we went to iraq to look for bin laden? huh?
try again billy or go back to 2nd grade.
2007-06-29 13:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋