In a hypothetical situation where an amendment to ban gay marriage reached a final senate vote needing only a majority, the vote is 50-50 requiring the VP to cast the tie breaking vote. Knowing that his political career is probably going to be pretty much over after his term as VP (at least as an elected official), does he vote against it, thus allowing his openly gay daughter to have the chance at marriage? Or does he continue to push the ultra-conservative ideals of the administration and vote for it?
2007-06-29
03:08:24
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Jason
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I guess I found myself thinking about this because politically he has nothing to lose by choosing to vote against the ban, thus putting his daughter before politcal ideals...
2007-06-29
03:25:08 ·
update #1