ho cares?
She is selecting slaves.
I think soniya is a great" Desh Bhakt"
and her Desh is Italy not India.
2007-06-30 09:07:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Girish Sharma,yahoo superstar 6
·
14⤊
0⤋
No Politician, definitely not Shekhawat, is without a skeleton or two in the cupboard.
Read the Economic Times assessment of Pratibha Patil, it's matter of fact, and I'm impressed.
Muck-raking and political vendetta has uncortunately become the hallmark of the BJP, a party i was really impressed with in my younger days.
Sonia Gandhi understands Indians more than you want to give her credit for ... how's it that diehard anti-Congree Shiv sena has also supported Ms Patil?
Patil's was Sonia's trump card, just like Manmohan Singh
Actually every person can be controversial...
Who knows? A little scratching around will reveal certain things about a particular bachelor scientist's sexuality that may be very embarrassing for the Hindu and Moslem Right.
This Presidential poll has been the dirtiest one and the most shameful. If Shekhawat is a gentleman, he should withdraw and allow the lady to become President uncontested.
It's a ceremonial title, isn't it?
2007-06-30 15:34:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by krishna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A person chosen by the leader of the Congress party and supported by a cotrie of psychophants and chamchas cannot but be a weak , pliable , yes-man or woman and ever ready to take orders from the political akaas. This is a historical fact.See the examples of FakhruddinAli Ahmed , Giani Zail Singh .
The Communists are enjoying power without answerability. Power hungry Congress is being forced to follow its dictats and Congress party s spineless and shameless followers are as usual singing hymns in praise of their leader and hiding behind her sari-palloo.Arjun singh, Manmohan singh,Motilal vohra, to name a few are hanging on since ages just because they have mastered the technology of chamchagiri.
The casuality as a result of all thse foxy-manupulations is the country and its management and administration.
The country definetly deserves a good administrator , a non-partisan and non-controvercial personality. But in a situation where pigmies are ruling through unprincipled and manupulated majority what else can be expected.
2007-07-02 03:27:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by brij_26pal 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
why do India need a president at all? Why should the tax payers bear the brunt of some one who is like a flower pot in the democratic system?
2007-06-30 06:48:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by frescocomolluvias 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
president must have these qualification ,
1. curruted 2. criminal 3. pseodo secularist 4. puppet of italian sonia gandhi 5. must have rhino skin 6. must have bank a/c in swiss bank .
2007-06-29 09:09:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by prithvi 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
when you look at the last controversial clinton presidency the answer should be obvious.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-06-29 06:27:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
We need Ron Paul or Tom Tancredo.
2007-06-29 09:09:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Vote Ron Paul!!!!
2007-06-29 06:23:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mom22 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
this is the A+ qualification for any political post in our INDIA
2007-06-29 06:32:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by bunty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
in indian democracy there is no need of a president. .it only creates controversies which effects the nation totally
2007-06-30 07:16:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hmmmm Bush has seemed to be pretty controversial
2007-06-29 06:30:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by The prophet of DOOM 5
·
0⤊
2⤋