What are the "laws" of a world like this... What are the advantages or dissadvantages of such an universe
2007-06-28 22:34:26 · 20 answers · asked by Camille 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
A world such as you propose would be one of sadness and longing.
(Rosicrucian knowledge)-We are intimately dependent upon each other for more than procreation. We on average alternate incarnations as man then women about every thousand years as the stars make possible new learning experiences unique to each sex.
(Plato's Symposium)-
Man and women fit together like pieces of a puzzle for a reason...
Plato said that God split us into two creatures for transgression and gave us the cosmic memory of our former state as a whole creative unit and called it the orgasm. HE gave us warning that man and women could be split likewise again for the same... hopefully not as having only one arm, one leg, one nostril, one eye, etc... but as a creature likewise debilitated... 4 to procreate if you will.
Hopefully your proposition will never be realized
2007-06-28 23:18:14 · answer #1 · answered by punk bitch piece of shit 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
While it isn't politically correct, I believe the female to be more cruel and vicious than the male.
Even if they could find a way to perpetuate the species I don't think we would have any less violence and war.
The reasons might change, and some of the forms of combat, but basically we'd be just as screwed up as we are now.
2007-06-28 23:16:52 · answer #2 · answered by dropkick 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Read 'Consider her Ways', John Wyndham written way back. Explores this scenario.The advantage would be the toilet seats would all be down and the disadvantages would be that you would have to effectively 'murder' generations of male babies. I appreciate this is a strong term but in order to survive women would have to do a fair number of artificial things with their bodies to produce only female children - and would the male be really dead, surviving in a tiny microcosom form in his own semen?
2007-06-28 22:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by bunter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A whole lot less fun for you ladies.
Then you have no kids and end your lives in despair.
Then everyone dies.
But that goes for men in a world without women too.
2007-06-28 23:03:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOTS AND LOTS OF WAR AND FOR NO REASON at least thats what the women in charge would say
woman #1 what did I do?
woman#2 oh!, you know what you did!
2007-06-28 22:47:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it wouldnt work. humans would not be able to keep the species alive. so eventually when all the women died.......humans would be extinct. like the dinosaurs. so the only "law" would be eventual extinction. imagine being the last and only person left.
2007-06-28 22:44:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be a wild garden. there would be no names for things. time would be marked only by birth and death and the coming and going of living things. diversity of personality, thought, and imagination would be replaced once again by diversity of species and ecosystems. there would still be plenty of suffering but there would never be any understanding. there would be no music.
2007-06-28 23:20:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton would probably win the presidential elections.
2007-06-28 22:41:44 · answer #8 · answered by Free the monkey in you! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women would be fully dressed ....no need to attract Men! However it would also be a lot noisier........gadging from the way they love talking!
2007-06-28 23:28:32 · answer #9 · answered by Hi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be just as disastrous as a world without women!
2007-06-28 22:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋