English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was reported yesterday that Tony Blair was interviewed a 3rd time by the Police relating to cash for honours scandal. Now that he has left office, is it not now time for the Police to actually prosecute him for corruption or for him to be prosecuted in the Hague as a war criminal for taking 'us' to war without the specific sanction of the United Nations for doing so ???

2007-06-28 20:46:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

21 answers

Blair and Bush should be prosecuted as War Criminals they are Dangerous self serving liars who have Innocent blood on their hands. Blood from both sides of the war.

They Lied to us and even when we protested they ignored us.
Blair is corrupt, Dangerous and conniving . He needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the Law.

We are being attacked in the UK as a direct result of Blair's actions. British Muslims are being excluded from society because of Blair's actions.

Cash for honors, come on if it were me I would already be sat in a cell.

Find him arrest him and prosecute him

2007-07-05 11:42:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes I do believe the Labour party made money for making people - Peers

I don't think Tony Blair should take all the backlash for this action that has happened as he wouldn't have made this decision on his own. They are like any other company trying to raise funds for the company to move forward.

As for the WAR, yes maybe it wasn't the best idea that he ever had, but still our troops are there working hard and getting killed. Lets not talk about it as a mistake, but a mission for a better earth.

2007-06-28 20:55:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

He could / should have been prosecuted while in office, already for his blatant corruption of the honours system. Hopefully he'll be pulled off to the Hague, if he isn't "dealt with" first by the people of the middle east.

2007-06-28 20:53:29 · answer #3 · answered by King_Nelson_Brilliant 2 · 2 2

I don't really see how you can say TB is corrupt!. OK he's self serving rat bag, but that pretty much like any other politician they all look after themselves first.

I don't agree with you that he is a war criminal either. He hasn't ordered the deaths of Innocent civilians, or committed genocide..
"most deaths of civilians in Iraq are being caused by its own people with car/ truck and suicide bombings due to religious differences between the two Muslims factions Sunni and shier". who are using the war situation to settle age old scores and further their own influences.

2007-06-28 22:56:18 · answer #4 · answered by robert x 7 · 1 2

Take a look at this list of war crimes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_crimes

Now, do you, or do you not think that although you probably like the sound of the word, and it makes you feel a big man to use it because its oh so clever and trendy to be a lefty at the moment and hate bush and Blair and all that without really understanding why, but maybe it doesn't really apply here?

Just think about it...

2007-06-28 21:32:26 · answer #5 · answered by Caffeine Fiend 4 · 0 2

Tony Blair went to war against trash ... he's a folk hero for that!
He and Bush should have bombed them to dust.

stuff the liberal do gooders and the lefties!

2007-07-04 07:07:16 · answer #6 · answered by george a 2 · 0 1

i'm specific alongside with myself there are various human beings interior the united kingdom and someplace else thinking how Blair has escaped justice for his unlawful conflict see you later and whilst his lengthy previous due comeuppance will happen.

2016-10-19 03:46:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Blair continues to be both corrupt and a war criminal. Its what the smell of corporate (oil) money does to you.

2007-06-28 20:49:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

The rights and wrongs of the war are open to opinion but the cash-for-houours thing is a crime and he should go to jail.

2007-06-28 20:59:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It is very apparent that our former Prime Minister was not always truthful!

2007-07-05 12:49:18 · answer #10 · answered by Whistler R 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers