Neither. It's the bullet flying at over 2800 fps that kills you!
2007-06-28 18:43:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
the person holding it. handguns don't go off by themselves and the person that is able to hold a handgun is capable of holding something even more dangerous.
2007-06-29 02:32:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by xPnPx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well the handgun probably can cause you more harm at tha time, but the person is the one that must formulate the intent to do harm.
2007-06-29 01:44:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lucky Guy111 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The mind of the person holding the gun .
2007-06-29 02:28:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by I was here 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The person holding the gun... I mean when is the last time you heard of a gun just getting up on its own and shooting someone.
2007-06-29 01:45:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by babydragonspawn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The person holding it.
2007-06-29 01:42:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The person holding it, of course.
2007-06-29 01:45:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Georgie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
my general answer would be the person because they are the one controlling the handgun . . . but if you feel like pondering a retorical question, then which one is more likely to go off first?
2007-06-29 01:46:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by 2tuforu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The person holding it. The military has an old saying. "This is my weapon, there are many like it, but this one is MINE! In my hands it is a deadly force. I am nothing without my weapon and my weapon is nothing without me"
2007-06-29 01:44:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Spark of Insanity 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The person holding the gun.
2007-06-29 01:45:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by tooyoung2bagrannybabe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Person holding it.
2007-06-29 01:42:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋