English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-28 16:03:41 · 4 answers · asked by Disease Precipitated By Aging 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

4 answers

Simple possible answer beats complicated possible answer.

(following that logic, since my answer is shortest I should win!)
lol

Peace

2007-06-28 16:43:02 · answer #1 · answered by zingis 6 · 0 0

(sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off," those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"):

entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,

which translates to:

entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.

This is often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest hypothetical entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as a heuristic maxim that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity in scientific theories.

2007-06-28 16:06:43 · answer #2 · answered by SpaGirl 5 · 0 0

All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one

2007-06-28 16:07:05 · answer #3 · answered by lickwid 2 · 1 0

mr. spock's version:
If you strip away all that is impossible, you're left only with what is logically possible, however unlikely...

2007-06-28 16:19:31 · answer #4 · answered by oldguy 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers