I don't really care but your name is "I hate Hillary" so hypocrisy comes to mind. I dislike her to but I also dislike Bush. The difference between these two is razor thin, too bad people need to vote her in to find out just like they did with Bush.
2007-06-28 15:40:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by 33 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Every President has and will continue to be criticized. The unfortunate thing for America and George Bush is that he or should I say his administration has actually done things which are truly deserving of criticism.
We are currently involved in a war that we should not be. Regardless as to whether or not you are a Bush supporter you have to admit and come to grips with the fact that we {the American Public} where mislead / lied to about the necessity to invade Iraq.
As a result of 9/11 should we have invaded Afghanistan ... 100% without a doubt yes. As a matter of fact if we had bombed it completely off the map I would feel no remorse. As a retired military officer I do not believe in a "measured response." I believe if you slap me then I should shoot you in the face with a bazooka.
Based upon the information that has recently been released to the public we had no good faith basis for entering Iraq. It has been admitted that the intelligence data was fabricated. Our involvement in the war will have on going consequences not just for Iraq but for America as well. One of the primary reasons America is in such an uproar is because of the financial impact this war is having on our country. {I won't even go into the loss of human life}
As a result of this war, our children's children will be financial shouldering this burden. At the time that I am writing this, our current national debt is 8.8 Trillion dollars. For effect I'll write it out this way $8,807,232,367,053. Our current cost of this war in Iraq $438,644,990,245.
Understand that we are in a defecit. Which means the money that we are spending on this war ... WE DONT HAVE. Now what happens when you borrow money. That's right you pay interest on that money. Paying the interest alone will take 2 possibly 3 generations of Americans.
So why is the President being criticized ... you have to come to grips with that for yourself ... or remain in denial {it aint just a river in Africa.}
2007-06-28 23:04:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by CuriousGuy92 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think people will talk about GWB for a long, long time. You know how people still talk about how bad Nixon was? It'll be like that. He'll be infamous in U.S. history books like Nixon or Sen. Joe McCarthy.
But how much longer will people talk about him around the water cooler? Well, conservatives are still trashing Clinton and Carter, so it could be for three decades or so.
In all fairness, after a hundred years or so, he'll probably be forgotten by most non-historians, like Pres. James Buchanan, who did nothing to stop the Civil War.
2007-06-28 23:01:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by mistersato 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's any easy one!
People are going to criticize Mr. Bush as long as he's in office!
I will elaborate even more on this topic: Mr. Bush will be criticized until he perishes.
More than likely, he is probably the most despised person in Northern America!
2007-06-28 23:19:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sustagurl2 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
someday they will wise up to the fact that progress does not come from condemnation. It comes from making plans instead of cutting down those that try. Since the libs have no plans they have to keep up a smoke screen by complaining about Bush. Sure mistakes were made but at least he tried and did not sit back like Clinton during the 90's. Now Hillary rants about how she will do things. If the people are dumb enough to elect her they will find she will do the same as Bill. NOTHING but attack those that work hard and make it to the middle class. The Rich continue to get richer and dance around taxes by paying off congress while the poor middle class keep getting pressure from both sides.
2007-06-28 22:41:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by hardnose 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Poor old George. I feel sorry for him. I'm not the brightest bulb in the house, but anybody else would run rings around him.
Then again, what choice did you have in your last election...
Kerry? You've got to be kidding!
Your last Elections were really a Rock & a Hard Place eh!
2007-06-28 22:44:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
People will stop complaining about George Bush when he stops giving people so much to complain about.
2007-06-28 22:40:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheWiseOne 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
there are still people whining about Lincoln Roosevelt and Truman no chance President Bush or his dad will catch any slack either
2007-06-28 22:48:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by fuma74 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree totally, they can all slag off George Bush and Tony Blair, but my question is what after 9/11 would any of these do goody good liberal Twats have done any different!!!!
2007-06-28 23:11:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
They will keep bad mouthing him lonnnggg after his is out of office...i8f the Dems get in they will be spouting how it will take decades to fix what he messed up . Sickening....
2007-06-29 01:12:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by danielle p 1
·
0⤊
0⤋