2007-06-28 14:16:33 · 8 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
it was a mistake because he didn't enforce it.
laws mean nothing without enforcement.
you would think our congress persons would realize that.
but i bet they do now.
2007-06-28 14:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem of illegal immigrants has grown to be a big headache to America. Any half hearted amnesty program without enforcing our laws will not work.
2007-06-28 21:27:34 · answer #2 · answered by ShanShui 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would have been acceptable if they had enforced the borders like they were supposed too. That's the reason I was opposed to this round of amnesty, it would be pointless as long as the borders were weak.
2007-06-28 21:21:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So Teddy, Hillary, Obama and the rest go down in flames and the best you can do is blame Ronald Reagan? Wow. Things must be very desperate in "Libland"...
Moe says it's time for you to quit embarrassing him...
2007-06-28 21:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by Ken C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the 12 million illegals occupying our nation are the proof.
2007-06-28 21:19:28 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the 80's called. it wants its "disco inferno" album back.
did you ask such a silly question because of that stroke you may have in 10 years.?
2007-06-28 21:27:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
they get their cheap labor either way... but I'm glad the Amnesty Bill was defeated.
2007-06-28 21:19:16 · answer #7 · answered by GOPanic 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yea.
2007-06-28 21:20:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋