fish
2007-06-28 12:24:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by William R 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most are fish: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anguillidae , but there are some animals that are called eels (rubber eels, for example) that are caecilians which are more closely related to salamanders: http://www.caf.wvu.edu/~rwhitmor/wman224/Links/Caecilians.htm
Their bodies just make them look snake-like.
2007-06-28 20:30:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by copperhead 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hold the animal underwater. If it drowns then it was a snake, if it lives then it is a fish.
However, if while holding it down it is eaten by another fish, then it was a worm.
2007-06-28 22:35:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by smiley0_1_1999 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think it is a fish. The only snake-like characteristic is the body.
2015-03-05 08:54:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brieana 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
personally i think that they are both...something prehistoric i guess. I live by a river an they are always there...weird looking animals...nor fish than snake though because of the fins...no scales or things like snakes have.
2007-06-28 12:22:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nutmeg Sky 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
It really depends. Do you mean the whole species or just any particular behavior. I most likely think they are fish/worms.
2007-07-02 03:28:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There in the "Mastacembelus erythrotaenia" group!
There Fish, not snakes......
2007-06-28 12:49:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adam D. 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
between those two options, they're fish, but i think they're technically something else
2007-06-28 12:29:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I've always thought of them as both.
2007-06-28 12:27:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by hazeleyes226 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Technically, like loaches, they are worms.
2007-06-28 12:22:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by ibewhoever@yahoo.com 4
·
0⤊
5⤋