Could be another legal arguement in his authority if it is incorporated within National Security.
2007-06-28 11:20:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If existing laws were enforced, we would not even be having this conversation.
2007-06-28 15:53:17 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amnesty is counter to National Security.
2007-06-28 18:32:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be unconstitutional. Only Congress can write laws. An executive order only affects the executive branch.
2007-06-28 18:34:04 · answer #3 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because even Bush doesn't want to see his poll numbers hit negatives. The Democrats would have a field day with that. It does Bush no good to tick off what few Republicans are left to support him
2007-06-28 18:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The president can't write laws by executive order, in fact the president cannot make laws.
2007-06-28 18:30:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because when it all goes TERRIBLY wrong. We won't be able to blame just him. Others will have to be accountable too.
Like Ted Kennedy.
Plus there's somthing else going on here. Not sure what but I think it's very sinister and it's being done by both sides.
Somthing tells me we'll all be bleeding from the rectum when all is said and done.
2007-06-28 18:32:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I hope amnesty never passes but there is one bright side to all of this...we now have EVERYONE of the politicians bellies exposed, we know who voted for this and we can vote them out next round.
2007-06-28 18:35:33 · answer #7 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't give him any ideas.
2007-06-28 18:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋