steve nash is better now
if wade didnt get injured hed be better
and hi xD
2007-06-28 02:55:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by joelord473 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What In A Hell Happen To These People Saying That Nash Is Better Than Wade??? In Only His 3rd Yr In The NBA, Wade Had Led His Team Into Championship, I Dont Have A Problem With Steve & Hes A Hell Of A Player Too, But 4 All These people saying That Nash Is Better Than Wade Is So Ridicolous. Com'on Guys Nash is Great, But He Cant Make His Team Into The Finals Even With His Power House Team Phoenix....So D-Wade Gets My Vote....
2007-06-28 13:34:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by -flash- 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I choose Nash. He is the kind of player that you really build a team around. He simply makes his teammates better. He improves them. He is a true leader, an excellent passer and a great three-point shooter also. Build solid role players around him and and they would be averaging career-highs. Nash is one of the hardest working players in the NBA and truly deserves a ring and he still has a chance to get his. Ask this question to many players in the league and I think maybe 3/4 of them would pick Nash. Ask the coaches and they would pick Nash.
But if you would consider age, and is looking for long-term success then Wade would be the better option since Steve Nash is already 34 years old.
2007-06-28 09:47:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by intzki 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're kidding me? Right?
Nash has 2 straight MVP's. Should have been 3 straight, in my opinion.
Wade has a Finals MVP. But those are only based on a single series, whereas MVP is based on an entire season.
Over time, Wade will probably win more championships... But no one pulls together a team as well as the Canadian. And that's why I give Nash the edge.
2007-06-28 09:43:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jason The Great 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nash
2007-06-28 10:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great question, Wade who has won a championship and Nash who has won 2 mvp titles in a row. hmmm............ Say that again, two MVP-titles in arow! Steve NAsh. His team has gone to the western conferance championship numerous times in a row and always a finals contendor. This is all because of him. They're both great but NAsh has the edge with abilties has a player that could basically do anything!
2007-06-28 09:44:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by iBall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya right like wade is better than nash we all know that nash can kill wade with one finger evryyyyyybodyyy knows that
2007-06-28 09:49:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by yuda buda b 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nash - by a wade margin.
2007-06-28 09:41:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nash is much better. With more experience to.
2007-06-28 09:43:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
wade is good but nash is better
2007-06-28 09:41:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by K y L e 1
·
0⤊
0⤋