English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

F U C K and what is the realy meaning! only serious answers pls!

2007-06-27 22:51:42 · 10 answers · asked by bubbles 4 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

10 answers

I had a book that said it came from an abbreviation that the Irish police used 100's of years ago. Alas I cant find the damn book. I have looked on the Internet and found a few my favourite it "Fornication Under Consent of the King" but not sure if that's its true origin.

2007-06-27 22:54:30 · answer #1 · answered by Psycho Chicken! 5 · 2 2

Hello Bubble,
All have answered in real good answers but mine not so good.
So here it goes in the English Language, " I CAN"T
F_CK ING LIVE WITHOUT YOU, SO GET YOUR F_CK ING SEXY BUNS OVER TO CANADA!" OK ;-)
And that is the true meaning of the word F_CK in my eye's.

2007-06-28 15:29:36 · answer #2 · answered by Bluelady... 7 · 1 0

Its first known use as a verb meaning to have sexual intercourse is in "Flen flyys", written around 1475.

William Dunbar's 1503 poem "Brash of Wowing" includes the lines: "Yit be his feiris he wald haue fukkit: / Ye brek my hairt, my bony ane" (ll. 13–14).

Some time around 1600, before the term acquired its current meaning, windfucker was an acceptable name for the bird now known as the kestrel[citation needed].

While Shakespeare never used the term explicitly; he hinted at it in comic scenes in several plays. The Merry Wives of Windsor (IV.i) contains the expression focative case (see vocative case). In Henry V (IV.iv), Pistol threatens to firk (strike) a soldier, a euphemism for ****. A Midsummer Night's Dream uses the word "foot" to pun on the French equivalent, "foutre".

The word **** has cognates in other Germanic languages, such as German ficken (to copulate), Middle Dutch fokken (to thrust, copulate, or to breed), dialectical Norwegian fukka (to copulate), and dialectical Swedish focka (to strike, copulate) and fock (penis).

This points to a possible etymology where Common Germanic ***–, by application of Grimm's law, would have as its most likely Indo-European ancestor *pug–, which appears in Latin and Greek words meaning "fight" and "fist". In early Proto-Germanic the word was likely used at first as a slang or euphemistic replacement for an older word for intercourse, and then became the usual word for intercourse.

Other possible connections are to Latin fÅ«tuere (almost exactly the same meaning as the English verb "to ****"); but it would have to be explained how the word reached Scandinavia from Roman contact, and how the t became k. From fÅ«tuere came French foutre, Catalan fotre, Italian fottere, Romanian futere, vulgar peninsular Spanish follar and joder, and Portuguese foder). However, there is considerable doubt and no clear lineage for these derivations. These roots, even if cognates, are not the original Indo-European word for to copulate, but Wayland Young (who agrees that these words are related) argues that they derive from the Indo-European *bhu– or *bhug– ("be", "become"), or as causative "create" [see Young, 1964]. A possible intermediate might be a Latin 4th-declension verbal noun *fÅ«tus, with possible meanings including "act of (pro)creating".

The Spanish verb follar has a different origin: according to Spanish etymologists, it (attested in the 19th century) derives via fuelle ("bellows") from Latin folle(m) < Indo-European *bhel–; the old Spanish verb folgar (attested in the 15th century) derived from Latin follicare, also ultimately from follem/follis.

The original Indo-European root for to copulate is likely to be *h3yebh– or *h3eybh–, which is attested in Sanskrit yabhati, Russian ебать (yebat'), Polish jebać, and Serbian јебати (jebati), among others: compare the Greek verb οιφω, and the Greek noun ζεφυρος (ref. a Greek belief that the west wind caused pregnancy).

2007-06-28 05:57:49 · answer #3 · answered by Maneet 3 · 1 1

[Fu*k] is a very old word, recorded in English since the 15th century (few acronyms predate the 20th century), with cognates in other Germanic languages. The Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang (Random House, 1994, ISBN 0-394-54427-7) cites Middle Dutch fokken = "to thrust, copulate with"; Norwegian dialect fukka = "to copulate"; and Swedish dialect focka = "to strike, push, copulate" and fock = "penis". Although German ficken may enter the picture somehow, it is problematic in having e-grade, or umlaut, where all the others have o-grade or zero-grade of the vowel.
AHD1, following Pokorny, derived "feud", "fey", "fickle", "foe", and "****" from an Indo-European root peig2 = "hostile"; but AHD2 and AHD3 have dropped this connection for "****" and give no pre-Germanic etymon for it. Eric Partridge, in the 7th edition of Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (Macmillan, 1970), said that "fu*k" "almost certainly" comes from the Indo-European root *peuk- = "to *****" (which is the source of the English words "compunction", "expunge", "impugn", "poignant", "point", "pounce", "pugilist", "punctuate", "puncture", "pungent", and "pygmy"). Robert Claiborne, in The Roots of English: A Reader's Handbook of Word Origin (Times, 1989) agrees that this is "probably" the etymon. Problems with such theories include a distribution that suggests a North-Sea Germanic areal form rather than an inherited one; the murkiness of the phonetic relations; and the fact that no alleged cognate outside Germanic has sexual connotations.

In plain English, this means the term's origin is likely Germanic, even though no one can as yet point to the precise word it came down to us from out of all the possible candidates. Further, a few scholars hold differing pet theories outside of the Germanic origin one, theories which appear to have some holes in them.

'Fu*k' is an old word, even if it's been an almost taboo term for most of its existence. It was around; it just wasn't used in common speech all that much, let alone written down and saved for posterity. Likely its meaning contributed to its precise origin becoming lost in the mists of time — scholars of old would have been in no hurry to catalogue the growth of this word, and by the time it forced its way into even the most respectable of dictionaries, its parentage was long forgotten.

The earliest cite in The Oxford English Dictionary dates from 1503. John Ayto, in his Dictionary of Word Origins cites a proper name (probably a joke or parody name) of 'John le Fuc*er' from 1250, quite possibly proof the word we casually toss about today was being similarly tossed about 750 years ago.

Spurious etymologies such as this one satisfy our urge for completion — we want to believe such a naughty word has a salacious back story, something replete with stocks and adulterers, or fornication permits handed out by a king. How utterly prosaic to find out 'fu*k' came to us the way most words sneak into the language — it jumped the fence from another tongue, was spelled and pronounced a bit differently in its new home, and over time drifted into being a distinct word recognized by everyone. Takes all the fun out of it, it does.

2007-06-28 05:58:06 · answer #4 · answered by Paula 3 · 1 2

f~ck
a difficult word to trace, in part because it was taboo to the editors of the original OED when the "F" volume was compiled, 1893-97. Written form only attested from early 16c. OED 2nd edition cites 1503, in the form fukkit; earliest appearance of current spelling is 1535 -- "Bischops ... may f~ck thair fill and be vnmaryit" [Sir David Lyndesay, "Ane Satyre of the Thrie Estaits"], but presumably it is a much more ancient word than that, simply one that wasn't likely to be written in the kind of texts that have survived from O.E. and M.E. Buck cites proper name John le F~cker from 1278. The word apparently is hinted at in a scurrilous 15c. poem, titled "Flen flyys," written in ******* L. and M.E.

2007-06-28 05:56:34 · answer #5 · answered by Bog woppit. 7 · 2 4

F orever I love you
U nhappy without you
C are about you
K iss me with a warm hug.

So, give me the biggest F.U.C.K ever!!!

2007-06-28 06:34:28 · answer #6 · answered by Lilaki 5 · 1 2

It's German in origin and is an acronym:

For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge

2007-06-28 05:55:20 · answer #7 · answered by dj 4 · 2 4

fornicating
under
carnal
knowledge
it was a catholic word used to define a sin

2007-06-28 05:57:21 · answer #8 · answered by done 4 · 2 3

This should answer all of your questions. Enjoy!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=AUaWCcDlI5s

2007-06-28 05:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by WM 2 · 1 2

English and it's a swear word

2007-06-28 05:57:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 6

fedest.com, questions and answers