English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-27 21:10:32 · 14 answers · asked by gonecrazybacksooninky 4 in Arts & Humanities History

14 answers

About as close as I am to marrying Brad Pitt tomorrow ;)

Operation Barbarossa was a colossal failure. The only thing the Germans managed to do was capture some industrial areas and some natural resources in places like the Ukraine. That, and really tick off the Russians.

Hitler was certain that his forces could advance and take Moscow, but he was delusional (surprise!). He actually had generals who warned him it was folly to turn on an ally. They advised him to win the war in the West, take control of Great Britain, get everything under control, and then turn on the USSR. Like so many other times, Hitler ignored his advisors, and went ahead with his harebrained schemes.

Hitler seriously miscalculated in three areas: the size, strength and dedication of the Red Army; the time it would take him and the amount of supplies he would need; and the weather.

Hitler and the German High Command thought the Red Army was only about half of its actual size, and they thought they were poorly trained. They figured the Red Army would suffer a spectacular defeat, which would in turn demoralize the entire country, and the USSR would fall neatly into their outstretched hands. Not so. The Red Army was huge. They weren't experienced or well-trained, but they had an awful lot of troops to throw at the Germans. The Wehrmacht was, without a doubt, the best trained and equipped fighting force at that point in the war, but they underestimated the Red Army's willingness to fight to the death to defend their country.

Another miscalculation was that Hitler thought victory would be swift, and that they wouldn't need a lot of supplies. His supply line was very long, which is always a disadvantage, as it takes a lot of time to move stuff around. He expected it to all be over with by the end of the summer or the early fall--he had no idea how long it would drag on.

The final miscalculation was the weather. The summer of 1941 was pretty warm, which was good for the Wehrmacht. Things looked really good at the beginning. The Germans were able to completely surprise the Russians, and the Russians took heavy casualties. They quickly got in gear, however, and started dishing out as good as they were getting. Hitler never dreamed it would drag on to wintertime. That happened to be a very bad winter, and his army simply wasn't equipped to deal with the snow. The Red Army, on the other hand, was at least accustomed to the bad weather.

Part of the result of the defeat of Barbarossa was that Hitler had managed to open an Eastern Front, and he didn't have enough troops to defend it. He tried again to gain a foothold in the USSR the following year, during the Battle of Stalingrad. Again, he miscalcuated how bad the weather would be, how many supplies he would need, and most of all, the spirit of the Russian people. The Red Army suffered a lot of casualties, but so did the Wehrmacht. However, the Russian people, the civilians, put up a brilliant defense of their city. They fought like crazy. I read somewhere that the Axis suffered approximately 3/4 of a million casualties--Stalingrad basically made it impossible for Hitler to win anything after that. He ended up conscripting old men, little boys, and troops from occupied countries who hated him and generally surrendered as soon as an Allied soldier walked by. He completely screwed himself.

Someone said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Hitler attacked the USSR and was repulsed, and then he turned around and did exactly the same thing the following year, and failed for exactly the same reasons. Apparently he never figured out how to learn from his mistakes.

2007-06-27 21:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by Bronwen 7 · 0 0

They came within a hairs breath from defeating the Soviets. If Moscow would have fallen, there was plenty of space to carry on the war, most of the war factories were moved east and the Caucasus oil fields were still in their control. After the defeat in front of Moscow, the war was still up for grabs. After Stalingrad, however, the end was no longer in doube.

2007-06-28 12:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

The German Army reached the outskirts of Moscow.

Middling close, it seems to me.

After that things went downhill.

The battle for Stalingrad, Von Paulus surrendering the remains of an army, was the first major defeat, and it was a staggering blow. It confirmed what much of the high command already sensed.

But Germany still might have rallied. Kursk was the real banner moment for the defeat in the east.

2007-06-28 09:11:45 · answer #3 · answered by Jack P 7 · 0 0

Not close. The troops were too spread out over Europe. If more troops would have gone against Russian it could have been another victory. Hitler under estimated Russia.

2007-06-28 04:17:56 · answer #4 · answered by Rob M 2 · 1 0

Not even remotely close. His supply lines were way too long. He had anticipated a quick victory and his troops were not prepared for a Russian winter, (remind you of anyone?).
He couldn't match them in armaments production, nor did he have access to the raw materials that they did, and he was outnumbered by about 1,000 to 1.

P.S. It was Stalingrad that was a decisive Russian victory and which is seen as the turning point of the war, not Leningrad.

2007-06-28 04:16:02 · answer #5 · answered by LodiTX 6 · 1 1

You know they were close if America and Russia had to join forces to defeat him.

2007-06-28 04:20:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Extremely. If he had realized he needed to have his troops adequately prepared to survive a Russian winter (like having his men in boots instead of barefoot cuz they marched their shoes off! Fact: he thought he would win before winter and therefor had no supplies in place to provide for his troops and many literally simply froze to death ) he might just have won, at least temporarily!

2007-06-28 04:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by naniannie 5 · 0 0

Very- but he could not defeat the spirit of the people of Stalingrad..

Oh yea...And if Hitler ever had shown his face in Leningrad....Vasily Zaytsev would have blown his head off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do svidaniya!

До свидания!

2007-06-28 04:47:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nazi could not brake soviets' spirit. Stalin passed the law to execute everybody who would run from the battlefield. He did nothing to release his only son from German concentration camp and let him die. Stalin made five-year-old children do bullets and weapons for Red army. This Georgia peasant (Josef Jugashvili) became a steel for the whole country and created the spirit of victory that nobody could brake.

2007-06-28 05:39:45 · answer #9 · answered by Lali 1 · 0 1

Not close at all. It was a plan doomed to fail. Operation Barbarrossa's worst flaw was to underestimate the Russian military.

2007-06-28 04:52:27 · answer #10 · answered by Letizia 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers