Words follow words thoughtlessly then thoughts by words' same habit. What thought would trust a thought that took shape of what words say?
2007-06-27 17:59:48 · 11 answers · asked by Rita 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Another tough question...Star!!
Words are indeed inadequate to give perfect shape to the thoughts..... sometimes silence conveys better and some other times action does the job better.... and yet none of these vehicles convey a thought either in its entirety or quality..... the conveyance improves a step only when the two minds are in perfect harmony and understanding which is what pure love can achieve..... mother's love for the child makes for a much better reading of its thoughts, words, actions and silence too. The step-up of true conveyance of thoughts reached through pure love is great, though in no way perfect.
No wonder then that even sincere answers here do not quite satisfy our questions!!
2007-06-27 23:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how to answer that,I don't think my thought trusted the shape of the words enough!
2007-06-27 18:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by Life goes on... 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is the fight to stay original. Original thoughts, original ideas that don't conform to normal ideals. A state of mind that envelops freedom around all thought process.
A creative mind that is not influenced by other thoughts or reality as we know it in everyday life.
A flow of sorts, totally free creation in the mind, totally free mental wanderings on a plane only to be seen and experienced by you.
This is where original ideas stem from.
2007-06-27 18:11:01 · answer #3 · answered by Sir Douglas 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
is the shape of words kind of like the shape of people or the shape of the world at this point in time
2007-06-27 18:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by Friend 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Belief
2007-06-28 09:27:45 · answer #5 · answered by Yoshi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If not the God of thought was brought,
the thought was not a lot!
2007-06-28 04:30:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen more to things than to things that are said. The dead ae never dead. There is no such thing as "nothing". If not: "something" is.
2007-06-28 07:40:33 · answer #7 · answered by Ke Xu Long 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rene once said "i think, therefore i am".
that however, is a faulty argument.
2007-06-27 22:04:11 · answer #8 · answered by Just Me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth!!
2007-06-27 18:04:35 · answer #9 · answered by lifescircle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no idea what you are trying to say.Sorry.
2007-06-27 18:50:19 · answer #10 · answered by ROBERT P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋