The problem isn't clearly stated. I assume you're dealing with a fraction where the numerator is(t^2+9)^(1/2) - 3, and the denominator is t^2. This does indeed go to 0/0 as t approaches zero, so you should use l'hopital's rule: if f(t) and g(t) both approach zero, then lim f(t)/g(t) = lim f'(t)/g'(t).
The derivative of the denominator is 2t, which still goes to 0.
Using the chain rule, the derivative of the numerator is
(1/2)*(t^2+9)^(-1/2)*2t, which also goes to zero.
So we apply l'hopital again.
The second derivative of the denominator is 2
To take the second derivative of the numerator, substitute u=t^2. Then du = 2t, so our first derivative turns into:
(1/2)*(u+9)^(-1/2) du
which gives us a second derivative of (1/2)*(-1/2)*(u+9)^(-3/2)
substituting t^2 in for u and simplifying,
(-1/4)*(t^2+9)^(-3/2)
but t is going to zero, so this turns into:
(-1/4)*9^(-3/2)
(-1/4)*(1/27)
(-1/108)
so assuming I did everything right here,
the limit is (-1/108)/2, or -1/216
In any case, when you have a limit that goes to 0/0 or infinity/infinity, l'hopital's rule is the thing to use.
2007-06-27 15:20:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bramblyspam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. L'Hopital's rule only applies when the limit reduces to 0/0 or inf/inf.
In this case, t only exists in the denominator. The limit doesn't exist since it approaches -inf from the right side and +inf from the left side.
If the x is supposed to be t, then the limit still doesn't exist. you wind up with:
(t - 3 - 3i) / t^2
The numerator approaches -3 - 3i while the denominator approaches 0.
2007-06-27 22:19:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bob G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think so, but you may as well take the derivative and rationalize just to make sure you are right. That's what I would do.
2007-06-27 21:58:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not getting your question, however you can use the l'hospital rule. That is by differentiating the numerator and denorminator separetely and substituting the limit given.
2007-06-27 21:58:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alfred G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋